Elizabeth Eppel

789 total citations
40 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Eppel is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Eppel has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Eppel's work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (10 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (9 papers). Elizabeth Eppel is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (10 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (9 papers). Elizabeth Eppel collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Hong Kong. Elizabeth Eppel's co-authors include Mary Lee Rhodes, Jane Koziol‐McLain, Louise Starkey, Miriam Lips, Allan Sylvester, Rosemary O’Leary, Anna Matheson, Mat Walton, Bill Ryan and David Turner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMJ Open and Information Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Eppel

38 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth Eppel New Zealand 12 113 101 90 80 71 40 446
Pierre‐Marc Daigneault Canada 13 106 0.9× 97 1.0× 75 0.8× 124 1.6× 55 0.8× 31 450
Sarah Morton United Kingdom 9 88 0.8× 83 0.8× 21 0.2× 143 1.8× 41 0.6× 30 417
Prudence Brown Australia 10 145 1.3× 34 0.3× 65 0.7× 162 2.0× 80 1.1× 32 401
Anders Hanberger Sweden 13 103 0.9× 181 1.8× 149 1.7× 68 0.8× 103 1.5× 58 460
Jenny Muir United Kingdom 12 111 1.0× 28 0.3× 28 0.3× 63 0.8× 43 0.6× 24 361
Andrea Migone Canada 12 103 0.9× 75 0.7× 204 2.3× 46 0.6× 38 0.5× 51 511
Mattia Casula Italy 12 115 1.0× 20 0.2× 101 1.1× 59 0.7× 36 0.5× 45 479
Scott P. Hays United States 7 81 0.7× 40 0.4× 109 1.2× 133 1.7× 24 0.3× 17 534
Harald Sætren Norway 7 119 1.1× 99 1.0× 178 2.0× 70 0.9× 46 0.6× 10 516
Ann Martin‐Sardesai Australia 14 53 0.5× 21 0.2× 78 0.9× 63 0.8× 97 1.4× 28 619

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Eppel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Eppel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Eppel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Eppel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Eppel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Eppel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Eppel. The network helps show where Elizabeth Eppel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Eppel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Eppel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Eppel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Eppel. Elizabeth Eppel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Koziol‐McLain, Jane, et al.. (2025). Capturing the emergence of change in complex systems: The ‘Atawhai’ study in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Evaluation. 31(2). 163–184.
2.
Koziol‐McLain, Jane, et al.. (2024). ‘Atawhai’: a primary care provider-led response to family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand. Archives of Public Health. 82(1). 74–74. 1 indexed citations
3.
Eppel, Elizabeth, et al.. (2024). Integrated System Responses for Families Impacted by Violence: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Integrated Care. 24(2). 17–17. 1 indexed citations
4.
Eppel, Elizabeth, et al.. (2022). If we can imagine it, we can build it: Developing Complexity Theory-Informed Methodologies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 21. 5 indexed citations
5.
Eppel, Elizabeth, et al.. (2021). Integrated system responses for families impacted by violence: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 11(11). e051363–e051363. 2 indexed citations
6.
Koziol‐McLain, Jane, et al.. (2021). Engaging with Uncertainty and Complexity: A Secondary Analysis of Primary Care Responses to Intimate Partner Violence. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 8. 2314587804–2314587804. 3 indexed citations
7.
Starkey, Louise, et al.. (2020). The educational value of internet use in the home for school children: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 53(4). 353–374. 37 indexed citations
9.
Koziol‐McLain, Jane, et al.. (2019). Exploring sustainable primary care responses to intimate partner violence in New Zealand: Qualitative use of complexity theory. BMJ Open. 9(11). e031827–e031827. 11 indexed citations
10.
Allen, Bárbara & Elizabeth Eppel. (2019). Holding on tight – NPM and the New Zealand performance improvement framework. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 79(2). 171–186. 2 indexed citations
11.
Starkey, Louise, Elizabeth Eppel, & Allan Sylvester. (2018). How do 10-year-old New Zealanders participate in a digital world?. Information Communication & Society. 22(13). 1929–1944. 8 indexed citations
12.
Eppel, Elizabeth, et al.. (2018). Advancing Complexity Theory as a Qualitative Research Methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 17(1). 44 indexed citations
13.
Eppel, Elizabeth, et al.. (2018). Exploring the complex pathway of the primary health care response to intimate partner violence in New Zealand. Health Research Policy and Systems. 16(1). 99–99. 14 indexed citations
14.
Starkey, Louise & Elizabeth Eppel. (2017). Digital data in New Zealand schools: Policy reform and school leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 47(4). 640–658. 16 indexed citations
15.
Eppel, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). Utilizing complexity theory to explore sustainable responses to intimate partner violence in health care. Public Management Review. 20(7). 1052–1067. 14 indexed citations
16.
Eppel, Elizabeth & Amanda Wolf. (2012). Implementing Better Public Services. Policy Quarterly. 8(3). 1 indexed citations
17.
Eppel, Elizabeth. (2011). Authorising Environment: Mapping Role Designation and Practice in the New Zealand Model- A review of the New Zealand literature. ResearchArchive–Te Puna Rangahau (Victoria University of Wellington). 1 indexed citations
18.
Eppel, Elizabeth, et al.. (2011). Cross-Agency Collaboration in New Zealand: An Empirical Study of Information Sharing Practices, Enablers and Barriers in Managing for Shared Social Outcomes. International Journal of Public Administration. 34(4). 255–266. 35 indexed citations
19.
Eppel, Elizabeth. (2009). The Contribution of Complexity Theory to Understanding and Explaining Policy Processes:A Study of Tertiary Education Policy Processesin New Zealand. 8 indexed citations
20.
Ryan, Bill, Derek Gill, Elizabeth Eppel, & Miriam Lips. (2008). Managing for joint outcomes: connecting up the horizontal and the vertical. Policy Quarterly. 4(3). 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026