Elizabeth Dale
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Dean McMillanMarie‐Claude BoilyChris BeyrerKate M. MitchellJocelyn ElmesKathleen ClaphamPeter J. KellyRowena Ivers
- Topics
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (3 papers)Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Dale
15 papers receiving 539 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Pharmacology 225
- Clinical Psychology 204
- Psychiatry and Mental health 116
- Cognitive Neuroscience 98
- General Health Professions 74
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Dale
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Dale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Dale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Dale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Dale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Dale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Dale. The network helps show where Elizabeth Dale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Dale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Dale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Dale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Dale. Elizabeth Dale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Painbreakdown → | 408 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | Debating – and Creating – Authority: The Failure of a Constitutional Ideal in Massachusetts Bay, 1629-1649 | 3 |
| 19 | 1 |
About Elizabeth Dale
Elizabeth Dale is a scholar working on Health, Virology and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (225 citations), Clinical Psychology (204 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (116 citations). Elizabeth Dale has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dean McMillan, Marie‐Claude Boily, Chris Beyrer, Kate M. Mitchell, Jocelyn Elmes, Kathleen Clapham, Peter J. Kelly, Rowena Ivers, James H. Conigrave and Teagan J. Weatherall. Their work appears in journals such as Addictive Behaviors, Clinical Journal of Pain and Annals of Plastic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.