Pia Åsbring

974 citations
7 papers · 726 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Pia Åsbring

6 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

Pia Åsbring
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 421
  • General Health Professions 193
  • Pharmacology 115
  • Pharmacy 22
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Piet J. M. Portegijs with:
Piet J. M. Portegijs Netherlands
Jesús Artal Spain
Saulo Castel Canada
Hilary McClafferty United States
C V Ford United States
Mark L. Willenbring United States
Ayna B. Johansen Norway
Anne Landheim Norway
Sónia F. Bernardes Portugal
Paul P. Christopher United States
Pia Åsbring relative to Piet J. M. Portegijs Netherlands Piet J. M. Portegijs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Piet J. M. Portegijs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pia Åsbring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pia Åsbring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pia Åsbring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pia Åsbring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pia Åsbring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pia Åsbring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pia Åsbring. The network helps show where Pia Åsbring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Pia Åsbring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pia Åsbring Line = papers co-authored together Pia Åsbring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2002296
2 2001194
3 2003158
4 200470
5 20126
6
[Group reflections about existential questions have a positive effect on empowerment and mental health].
20061
7
[Priority decisions in health care--a survey of attitudes. Treatment of athletic injuries should be removed from public health care].
19941

About Pia Åsbring

Pia Åsbring is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 7 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Workplace Health and Well-being (1 paper), Community Health and Development (1 paper), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (1 paper) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (421 citations), General Health Professions (193 citations), Pharmacology (115 citations), Pharmacy (22 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Pia Åsbring has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and India. Frequent co-authors include Anna-Liisa Närvänen and J Calltorp. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Health Research, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Health Psychology, Social Science & Medicine and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact