Elizabeth Asher

1.2k citations
21 papers · 339 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Elizabeth Asher

21 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Asher
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Oceanography 191
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 36
  • Atmospheric Science 222
  • Global and Planetary Change 128
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 30
Replace John Bisgrove with:
John Bisgrove United States
Dennis Booge Germany
Hisayuki Yoshikawa‐Inoue Japan
Francis J. Gilbert United Kingdom
K. Gorzelska United States
Aimee Neeley United States
Shengqian Zhou China
Eunho Jang South Korea
C. Leck Sweden
Kimberly C. Kelly United States
Elizabeth Asher relative to John Bisgrove United States John Bisgrove's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
John Bisgrove · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Asher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Asher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Asher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Asher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Asher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Asher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Asher. The network helps show where Elizabeth Asher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth Asher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elizabeth Asher Line = papers co-authored together Elizabeth Asher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201158
2 201451
3 201631
4 201528
5 201128
6 201725
7 201518
8 202315
9 202314
10 202414
11 202113
12 202310
13 20188
14 20235
15 20195
16 20214
17 20244
18 20193
19 20192
20 20242

About Elizabeth Asher

Elizabeth Asher is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Process Chemistry and Technology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 21 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (15 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (10 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (6 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (6 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (6 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (2 papers) and Marine Biology and Ecology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (191 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (36 citations), Atmospheric Science (222 citations), Global and Planetary Change (128 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (30 citations). Elizabeth Asher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Philippe D. Tortell, John W. H. Dacey, Kevin R. Arrigo, Matthew M. Mills, Michael R. Stukel, Hugh W. Ducklow, Anissa Merzouk, Matthew C. Long, J. W. H. Dacey and M. Angélica Peña. Their work appears in journals such as Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Global Biogeochemical Cycles and Limnology and Oceanography Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact