Global Biogeochemical Cycles

3.2k papers and 267.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles in the last decades have received a total of 267.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles usually cover Oceanography (1.6k papers), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k papers) and Atmospheric Science (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Marine and coastal ecosystems (1.5k papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (916 papers) and Marine Biology and Ecology Research (519 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Biogeochemical Cycles are Jorge L. Sarmiento, Jonathan A. Foley, Navin Ramankutty, Nicolas Gruber, Meinrat O. Andreae, Lex Bouwman, Scott C. Doney, Inez Fung, E. Maier‐Reimer and David Archer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

Countries where authors publish in Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Biogeochemical Cycles more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025