Elisabeth Hildt
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Andreas G. FrankeKlaus LiebAndreas FellgiebelClément LevalloisChristiana BagusatRobert LeebAngela RiccioAbdul Al-Khodairy
- Topics
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (18 papers)Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (6 papers)Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Elisabeth Hildt
46 papers receiving 723 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Cognitive Neuroscience 515
- Psychiatry and Mental health 171
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 101
- Pharmacology 82
- Clinical Psychology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Hildt
This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Hildt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Hildt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Hildt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Hildt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Hildt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Hildt. The network helps show where Elisabeth Hildt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Hildt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Hildt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Hildt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Hildt. Elisabeth Hildt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Infusing Ethics in Research Groups: A Bottom-Up, Context-Specific Approach. | 3 |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 167 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Elisabeth Hildt
Elisabeth Hildt is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research, having authored 48 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (18 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (6 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (515 citations), Health Informatics (19 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (171 citations). Elisabeth Hildt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andreas G. Franke, Klaus Lieb, Andreas Fellgiebel, Clément Levallois, Christiana Bagusat, Robert Leeb, Angela Riccio, Abdul Al-Khodairy, Iolanda Pisotta and Martin Rohm. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.