Elisabeth Flo

3.1k citations
60 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Elisabeth Flo

56 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Elisabeth Flo
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 889
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 287
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 164
  • General Health Professions 834
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 222
Replace Kenneth C. Pike with:
Kenneth C. Pike United States
Benjamin Fischler Belgium
Biren B. Kamdar United States
Nancy Wilson United States
Ann Kolanowski United States
Martin Smalbrugge Netherlands
Philippe Voyer Canada
Alva Baker United States
Carla R. Jungquist United States
Bettina S. Husebø Norway
Elisabeth Flo relative to Kenneth C. Pike United States Kenneth C. Pike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.0×
Kenneth C. Pike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Flo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Flo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Flo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Flo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Flo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Flo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Flo. The network helps show where Elisabeth Flo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elisabeth Flo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elisabeth Flo Line = papers co-authored together Elisabeth Flo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012238
2 2013197
3 2014169
4 2016102
5 201495
6 201695
7 201384
8 201477
9 201466
10 201951
11 201650
12 201849
13 201746
14 201445
15 202044
16 201743
17 201841
18 201639
19 201539
20 201839

About Elisabeth Flo

Elisabeth Flo is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (19 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (8 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (8 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (889 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (287 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (164 citations), General Health Professions (834 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (222 citations). Elisabeth Flo has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bettina S. Husebø, Bjørn Bjorvatn, Ståle Pallesen, Bente E. Moen, Inger Hilde Nordhus, Wilco P. Achterberg, Nils Magerøy, Eirunn Thun, Janne Grønli and Dag Aarsland. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, Frontiers in Psychology, BMC Medical Ethics, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Sleep Medicine Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact