Reidar Pedersen

4.2k total citations
130 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Reidar Pedersen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Reidar Pedersen has authored 130 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 93 papers in General Health Professions, 82 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 44 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Reidar Pedersen's work include Ethics in medical practice (57 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (51 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (35 papers). Reidar Pedersen is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (57 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (51 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (35 papers). Reidar Pedersen collaborates with scholars based in Norway, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Reidar Pedersen's co-authors include Rei­dun Før­de, Lillian Lillemoen, Elisabeth Gjerberg, Marit Helene Hem, Bert Molewijk, Reidun Norvoll, Morten Magelssen, Tonje Lossius Husum, Lisbeth Thoresen and Per Nortvedt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Reidar Pedersen

122 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Reidar Pedersen Norway 29 1.7k 1.6k 758 517 277 130 2.7k
Rei­dun Før­de Norway 30 2.2k 1.3× 2.1k 1.3× 548 0.7× 144 0.3× 630 2.3× 170 3.3k
Dennis H. Novack United States 28 2.6k 1.5× 2.3k 1.4× 328 0.4× 1.4k 2.7× 315 1.1× 59 4.3k
Britt‐Marie Ternestedt Sweden 31 920 0.5× 1.4k 0.9× 787 1.0× 247 0.5× 481 1.7× 88 2.6k
Jean Watson United States 22 1.4k 0.8× 590 0.4× 514 0.7× 253 0.5× 162 0.6× 57 2.8k
Wendy Austin Canada 27 1.2k 0.7× 776 0.5× 399 0.5× 131 0.3× 266 1.0× 68 2.0k
Gill Thomson United Kingdom 32 556 0.3× 1.2k 0.8× 1.2k 1.5× 431 0.8× 1.1k 3.9× 150 3.3k
Åshild Slettebø Norway 30 1.0k 0.6× 936 0.6× 453 0.6× 205 0.4× 126 0.5× 113 2.2k
Beth A. Lown United States 23 1.3k 0.7× 974 0.6× 271 0.4× 651 1.3× 96 0.3× 51 2.1k
Joseph A. Carrese United States 27 1.1k 0.6× 1.3k 0.8× 352 0.5× 229 0.4× 203 0.7× 71 2.2k
Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen Netherlands 28 1.2k 0.7× 907 0.6× 462 0.6× 646 1.2× 296 1.1× 95 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Reidar Pedersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reidar Pedersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reidar Pedersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reidar Pedersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reidar Pedersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reidar Pedersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reidar Pedersen. The network helps show where Reidar Pedersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reidar Pedersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reidar Pedersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reidar Pedersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Reidar Pedersen. Reidar Pedersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Før­de, Rei­dun, et al.. (2025). Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Study at National and Organizational Levels. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 31(4). e70131–e70131.
2.
Romøren, Maria, Astrid Klopstad Wahl, Lisbeth Thoresen, et al.. (2024). Implementation of advance care planning in the routine care for acutely admitted patients in geriatric units: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research. 24(1). 220–220. 3 indexed citations
3.
Pedersen, Reidar, et al.. (2024). Ethics in the operating room: a systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics. 25(1). 128–128. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pedersen, Reidar, et al.. (2023). Balancing burdens of infection control: Norwegian district medical officers’ ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Services Research. 23(1). 590–590. 1 indexed citations
5.
Romøren, Maria, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang, Torleif Ruud, et al.. (2023). Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons with Psychotic Disorders (IFIP): A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 50(3). 520–533. 8 indexed citations
7.
Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik, et al.. (2021). Family involvement practices for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres – a cross-sectional fidelity-based study. BMC Psychiatry. 21(1). 285–285. 20 indexed citations
8.
Pedersen, Reidar, et al.. (2020). Nursing home residents with cognitive impairment can participate in advance care planning: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(2). 879–888. 13 indexed citations
9.
Romøren, Maria, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang, Bente Weimand, et al.. (2020). Implementation of guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres (IFIP): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research. 20(1). 934–934. 14 indexed citations
10.
Pedersen, Reidar, et al.. (2019). Implementing ethics reflection groups in hospitals: an action research study evaluating barriers and promotors. BMC Medical Ethics. 20(1). 49–49. 16 indexed citations
11.
Huniche, Lotte, et al.. (2019). Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice. BMC Medical Ethics. 20(1). 75–75. 10 indexed citations
13.
Hem, Marit Helene, Bert Molewijk, & Reidar Pedersen. (2017). Systematisk etikkrefleksjon gjør en forskjell. Et ressurshefte for etikkrefleksjonsgrupper i psykisk helsevern. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 1 indexed citations
14.
Romøren, Maria, Reidar Pedersen, & Rei­dun Før­de. (2016). How do nursing home doctors involve patients and next of kin in end-of-life decisions? A qualitative study from Norway. BMC Medical Ethics. 17(1). 5–5. 27 indexed citations
15.
Svantesson, Mia, Jan Karlsson, Guy Widdershoven, et al.. (2014). Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics. 15(1). 30–30. 56 indexed citations
16.
Pedersen, Reidar, Per Nortvedt, Marita Nordhaug, et al.. (2008). In quest of justice? Clinical prioritisation in healthcare for the aged. Journal of Medical Ethics. 34(4). 230–235. 54 indexed citations
17.
Pedersen, Reidar, et al.. (2007). Mangelfull oversikt over etiske retningslinjer. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening. 1 indexed citations
18.
Før­de, Rei­dun, Reidar Pedersen, Per Nortvedt, & Olaf Gjerløw Aasland. (2006). [Enough resources to the care of the elderly?].. PubMed. 126(15). 1913–6. 21 indexed citations
19.
Før­de, Rei­dun, Reidar Pedersen, Per Nortvedt, & Olaf Gjerløw Aasland. (2006). Får eldreomsorgen nok ressurser. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening. 3 indexed citations
20.
Pedersen, Reidar & Rei­dun Før­de. (2005). Hva gjør de kliniske etikkomiteene. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026