Elisa García
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Antonio IbarraRaúl Silva‐GarcíaSusana MartiñónHumberto MestreDoris J. BucherSam MilsteinAna María Fernández-PresasGabriel Gutiérrez‐Ospina
- Topics
- Spinal Cord Injury Research (27 papers)Nerve injury and regeneration (20 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Pathology and Forensic MedicineDevelopmental NeuroscienceCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Elisa García
31 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 357
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 230
- Molecular Biology 118
- Genetics 113
- Neurology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Elisa García
This map shows the geographic impact of Elisa García's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisa García with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisa García more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elisa García
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisa García. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisa García. The network helps show where Elisa García may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisa García
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisa García. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisa García based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisa García. Elisa García is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Elisa García
Elisa García is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (27 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (20 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (357 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (81 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (230 citations). Elisa García has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Ibarra, Raúl Silva‐García, Susana Martiñón, Humberto Mestre, Doris J. Bucher, Sam Milstein, Ana María Fernández-Presas, Gabriel Gutiérrez‐Ospina, Gabriel Guı́zar-Sahagún and Marı́a G. Campos. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Brain Research and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.