Eliana Raiola
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Health Information Management top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Giovanni ImprotaMaria TriassiEmma MontellaPiera CentobelliLiberatina Carmela SantilloGiovanni BalatoMario CesarelliMaria Romano
- Topics
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers)Healthcare Quality and Management (3 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Eliana Raiola
13 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Management Information Systems 63
- Health Information Management 42
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 36
- Emergency Medical Services 36
- Strategy and Management 35
Countries citing papers authored by Eliana Raiola
This map shows the geographic impact of Eliana Raiola's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliana Raiola with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliana Raiola more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eliana Raiola
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliana Raiola. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliana Raiola. The network helps show where Eliana Raiola may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eliana Raiola
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eliana Raiola. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eliana Raiola based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eliana Raiola. Eliana Raiola is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 79 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | High-dose methylprednisolone infusions in relapsing and in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis patients. One year follow-up. | 10 |
About Eliana Raiola
Eliana Raiola is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Health Informatics and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (34 citations), Health Information Management (42 citations) and Management Information Systems (63 citations). Eliana Raiola has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Improta, Maria Triassi, Emma Montella, Piera Centobelli, Liberatina Carmela Santillo, Giovanni Balato, Mario Cesarelli, Maria Romano, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione and Mario Alessandro Russo. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice and Expert Opinion on Drug Safety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.