Countries citing papers authored by Elea Giménez‐Toledo
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elea Giménez‐Toledo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elea Giménez‐Toledo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elea Giménez‐Toledo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elea Giménez‐Toledo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elea Giménez‐Toledo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elea Giménez‐Toledo. The network helps show where Elea Giménez‐Toledo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elea Giménez‐Toledo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elea Giménez‐Toledo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elea Giménez‐Toledo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elea Giménez‐Toledo. Elea Giménez‐Toledo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea, Gunnar Sivertsen, & Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez. (2019). International Register of Academic Book Publishers (IRAP): overview, current state and future challenges.. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 1752–1758.3 indexed citations
3.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea. (2019). Impactos de la publicación académica en español. Revista de occidente. 56–70.1 indexed citations
4.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea, Gunnar Sivertsen, & Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez. (2017). Peer Review as a Delineation Criterion in Data Sources for the Assessment and Measurement of Scholarly Book Publishing in Social Sciences and Humanities.. ISSI. 118–124.4 indexed citations
5.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea & Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez. (2016). La edición académica española a partir de sus metadatos. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 125–131.1 indexed citations
6.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea & Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez. (2016). Lo cuantitativo en las Humanidades: los casos de la evaluación y la edición científica. 25–27.1 indexed citations
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea. (2013). Reflexiones sobre las revistas científicas españolas. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 7(1). 118–121.2 indexed citations
11.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea, et al.. (2012). ¿Por qué nadie habla ya de las bases de datos bibliográficas "clásicas"?. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 6(1). 130–134.1 indexed citations
Mañana-Rodríguez, Jorge & Elea Giménez‐Toledo. (2011). Coverage of Spanish social sciences and humanities journals by national and international databases.. Information Research. 16.5 indexed citations
14.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea & Daniel Torres‐Salinas. (2011). Book citation index: nueva historia sobre big science y little science. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 5(1). 203–205.2 indexed citations
15.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea. (2010). Papel de los servicios de publicaciones en la mejora de las revistas científicas universitarias. Anuario ThinkEPI. 4(1). 266–268.2 indexed citations
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea, et al.. (2000). EVALUACIÓN DE REVISTAS CIENTÍFICAS: ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DE DOS MODELOS Y SU APLICACIÓN A CINCO REVISTAS ESPAÑOLAS DE BIBLIOTECONOMÍA Y DOCUMENTACIÓN *. Interciencia. 25(5). 234–241.3 indexed citations
20.
Giménez‐Toledo, Elea, et al.. (2000). Las revistas españolas de economía: una propuesta de evaluación científica. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de economía. 133–162.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.