Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective
2013331 citationsEldon Y. Li, HsiuJu Rebecca Yen et al.profile →
Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: The case of Yangtze river economic belt in China
This map shows the geographic impact of Eldon Y. Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eldon Y. Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eldon Y. Li more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eldon Y. Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eldon Y. Li. The network helps show where Eldon Y. Li may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eldon Y. Li
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eldon Y. Li.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eldon Y. Li based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eldon Y. Li. Eldon Y. Li is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lin, Arthur J., et al.. (2018). DYSFUNCTIONAL CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR IN CROSS-BORDER E-COMMERCE: A JUSTICE-AFFECT-BEHAVIOR MODEL. Journal of electronic commerce research. 19(1). 36–54.30 indexed citations
3.
Li, Eldon Y., et al.. (2016). Exploring Consumer Value of Cross-Border Online Shopping: an Application of means-End Chain Theory and Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 359.1 indexed citations
Li, Eldon Y., et al.. (2013). From Structural Assurances to Trusting Beliefs: Validating Persuasion Principles in the Context of Online Shopping. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 127.4 indexed citations
7.
Li, Eldon Y., et al.. (2013). Applying Customer Knowledge Management To Alignment And Integration Of Strategy Maps. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 233–239.2 indexed citations
8.
Li, Eldon Y., et al.. (2010). The Impact of Experience in Service Virtualization on Travel Intention - The Case of Forbidden City Tour. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
9.
Li, Eldon Y., et al.. (2009). Information synergy as the catalyst between information technology capability and innovativeness: empirical evidence from the financial service sector. Information Research. 14(1). 7.26 indexed citations
Wild, Rosemary H., Kenneth Griggs, & Eldon Y. Li. (2003). A Web Portal/Simulation Architecture to Support Collaborative Policy and Planning Decision Making.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 312.1 indexed citations
Li, Eldon Y.. (1990). Software testing in a system development process: A life cycle perspective.7 indexed citations
20.
Li, Eldon Y.. (1988). Software Testing Techniques for the Information Systems Professional: a curriculum Perspective.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 7.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.