Elaine Scharfe

1.3k citations
24 papers · 934 indexed · h-index 13

Elaine Scharfe

24 papers receiving 857 citations

Peers

Elaine Scharfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Social Psychology 707
  • Clinical Psychology 497
  • Demography 273
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 181
  • Health 76
Replace Judith A. Crowell with:
Judith A. Crowell United States
Dory A. Schachner United States
Susan Merrick United States
Sandrine Pihet Switzerland
Lydia Hohaus Australia
Yuthika U. Girme Canada
Ora Peleg Israel
Heinz Kindler Germany
Diane St‐Laurent Canada
Alice C. Schermerhorn United States
Elaine Scharfe relative to Judith A. Crowell United States Judith A. Crowell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Judith A. Crowell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elaine Scharfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine Scharfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine Scharfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine Scharfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine Scharfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine Scharfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine Scharfe. The network helps show where Elaine Scharfe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Elaine Scharfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elaine Scharfe Line = papers co-authored together Elaine Scharfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20231
3 20209
4 20203
5 20192
6 20191
7 20175
8 201519
9 201516
10 201237
11 20113
12
Benefits of mother goose: influence of a community-based program on parent-child attachment relationships in typical families.
201111
13 200732
14 20034
15 200337
16
Stability and Change of Attachment Representations from Cradle to Grave.
200314
17 200181
18
Development of emotional expression, understanding, and regulation in infants and young children.
200032
19 199827
20 1994447

About Elaine Scharfe

Elaine Scharfe is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Demography and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 934 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (20 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (707 citations), Clinical Psychology (497 citations) and Demography (273 citations). Elaine Scharfe has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kim Bartholomew, Deborah H. Eldredge, Valerie Cole, Ray Koopman, Antonia J. Z. Henderson, Nicole Paradise Black, Jessica Reid, Abby L. Goldstein, Danielle S. Molnar and David S. Green. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026