Elaine Gardner
About
In The Last Decade
Elaine Gardner
5 papers receiving 387 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 129
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 123
- Biochemistry 122
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 71
- Physiology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Elaine Gardner
This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine Gardner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine Gardner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine Gardner. The network helps show where Elaine Gardner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elaine Gardner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elaine Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elaine Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elaine Gardner. Elaine Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best practice in infancy: moving onto cups. | 0 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 105 | |
| 4 | 183 | |
| 5 | 122 | |
| 6 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.