Eileen Spring
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Historical Economic and Social Studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 12
-
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 3
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics 1
- Co-authors
- David Spring (5 shared papers)A. W. Brian Simpson (1 shared paper)Sybil Wolfram (1 shared paper)Lloyd Bonfield (2 shared papers)Amy Louise Erickson (1 shared paper)Linda A. Pollock (1 shared paper)David Mba (1 shared paper)Lawrence Stone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (5 papers)The Economic History Review (4 papers)American Journal of Legal History (3 papers)Journal of History (3 papers)Law and History Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Eileen Spring
21 papers receiving 139 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- History 49
- Economics and Econometrics 89
- Law 27
- Religious studies 12
- Classics 8
Countries citing papers authored by Eileen Spring
This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen Spring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen Spring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen Spring. The network helps show where Eileen Spring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Eileen Spring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 43 | |
| 2 | Ecology and religion in history | 1974 | 28 |
| 3 | 1988 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1964 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1956 | 2 |
About Eileen Spring
Eileen Spring is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Soil Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (12 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (3 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (2 papers), Historical Economic and Legal Thought (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (1 paper), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (1 paper) and Scottish History and National Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (49 citations), Economics and Econometrics (89 citations), Law (27 citations), Religious studies (12 citations) and Classics (8 citations). Eileen Spring has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include David Spring, A. W. Brian Simpson, Sybil Wolfram, Lloyd Bonfield, Amy Louise Erickson, Linda A. Pollock, David Mba and Lawrence Stone. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review, American Journal of Legal History, Journal of History and Law and History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.