Eileen Luders
About
In The Last Decade
Eileen Luders
4 papers receiving 229 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 104
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 53
- Psychiatry and Mental health 50
- Neurology 30
- Neurology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Eileen Luders
This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen Luders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen Luders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen Luders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen Luders
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen Luders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen Luders. The network helps show where Eileen Luders may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eileen Luders
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eileen Luders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eileen Luders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eileen Luders. Eileen Luders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | CAT: a computational anatomy toolbox for the analysis of structural MRI data breakdown → | 207 |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 12 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.