Petra Redel
About
In The Last Decade
Petra Redel
11 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 258
- Psychiatry and Mental health 100
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 33
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Petra Redel
This map shows the geographic impact of Petra Redel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Petra Redel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petra Redel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Petra Redel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Petra Redel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Petra Redel. The network helps show where Petra Redel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Petra Redel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Petra Redel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Petra Redel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Petra Redel. Petra Redel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 61 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 78 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 37 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.