Eiji Shimizu
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Oncology top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 1%
- Co-authors
- Masaomi IyoKenji HashimotoJoe Z. TsienYa‐Ping TangClaire RamponMichiko NakazatoNaoe OkamuraChikara Kumakiri
- Topics
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (52 papers)Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (47 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (46 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Eiji Shimizu
615 papers receiving 17.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Molecular Biology 4.8k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 4.6k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.9k
- Oncology 2.1k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Eiji Shimizu
This map shows the geographic impact of Eiji Shimizu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eiji Shimizu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eiji Shimizu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eiji Shimizu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eiji Shimizu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eiji Shimizu. The network helps show where Eiji Shimizu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eiji Shimizu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eiji Shimizu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eiji Shimizu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eiji Shimizu. Eiji Shimizu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Neuropsychological Comparison Between Patients with Social Anxiety and Healthy Controls: Weak Central Coherence and Visual Scanning Deficit | 1 |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | Factor Structure and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Young Schema Questionnaire Short Form | 3 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | [Collaboration between psychiatrists and clinical psychologists for efficient delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy in Japan]. | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 126 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Eiji Shimizu
Eiji Shimizu is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Microbiology, having authored 650 papers that have together received 17.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (52 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (47 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (46 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (1.6k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (1.1k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (1.1k citations). Eiji Shimizu has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Masaomi Iyo, Kenji Hashimoto, Joe Z. Tsien, Ya‐Ping Tang, Claire Rampon, Michiko Nakazato, Naoe Okamura, Chikara Kumakiri, Naoya Komatsu and Min Zhuo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.