Ei’ichi Shibata
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Masaki AndoHiro-omi YOKOTATatsuya OtaniToru KoizumiH. SatoMinako UedaShin‐Ichi YamamotoToshio Higuchi
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (29 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (21 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ei’ichi Shibata
62 papers receiving 752 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Ecology 605
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 389
- Insect Science 354
- Plant Science 196
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 190
Countries citing papers authored by Ei’ichi Shibata
This map shows the geographic impact of Ei’ichi Shibata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ei’ichi Shibata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ei’ichi Shibata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ei’ichi Shibata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ei’ichi Shibata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ei’ichi Shibata. The network helps show where Ei’ichi Shibata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ei’ichi Shibata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ei’ichi Shibata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ei’ichi Shibata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ei’ichi Shibata. Ei’ichi Shibata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vegetational changes between 1983 and 2001 on the Ohdaigahara Subalpine Plateau, central Japan, with a high density of sika deer (Cervus nippon). | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Life and resource utilization of insects living on tree phloem and wood( Life and resource utilization of insects living on tree phloem and wood) | 1 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Ei’ichi Shibata
Ei’ichi Shibata is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (29 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (21 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (389 citations), Insect Science (354 citations) and Ecology (605 citations). Ei’ichi Shibata has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Masaki Ando, Hiro-omi YOKOTA, Tatsuya Otani, Toru Koizumi, H. Sato, Minako Ueda, Shin‐Ichi Yamamoto, Toshio Higuchi, Yasuyuki Sakuratani and Fumiaki Kimura. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Tree Physiology and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.