Efigênia de Melo
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Plant Science
- Molecular Biology
- Insect Science
- Environmental Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Flávio FrançaCândida Maria Lima AguiarAristóteles Goés‐NetoCarlos Alberto Cid FerreiraRogério GribelMaria Iracema Bezerra LoiolaMaria Teresa BurilFabiana Regina Nonato
- Topics
- Plant Diversity and Evolution (11 papers)Plant and animal studies (10 papers)Fern and Epiphyte Biology (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaActa Botanica BrasilicaActa Amazonica
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
Efigênia de Melo
19 papers receiving 133 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 103
- Plant Science 53
- Molecular Biology 37
- Insect Science 21
- Environmental Chemistry 16
Countries citing papers authored by Efigênia de Melo
This map shows the geographic impact of Efigênia de Melo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Efigênia de Melo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Efigênia de Melo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Efigênia de Melo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Efigênia de Melo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Efigênia de Melo. The network helps show where Efigênia de Melo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Efigênia de Melo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Efigênia de Melo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Efigênia de Melo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Efigênia de Melo. Efigênia de Melo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | Medicinal uses of plant species in background pasture areas in Northeast Brazil | 2 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Diversidad de especies de hormigas en un gradiente de cafetales orgánicos y convencionales | 1 |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | Morfo-anatomia das flores estaminadas e pistiladas de especies de Coccoloba P. Browne (Polygonaceae) | 4 |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Efigênia de Melo
Efigênia de Melo is a scholar working on Forestry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 143 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers) and Fern and Epiphyte Biology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (103 citations), Horticulture (5 citations) and Insect Science (21 citations). Efigênia de Melo has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Flávio França, Cândida Maria Lima Aguiar, Aristóteles Goés‐Neto, Carlos Alberto Cid Ferreira, Rogério Gribel, Maria Iracema Bezerra Loiola, Maria Teresa Buril, Fabiana Regina Nonato, Ana María Giulietti and Celso Feitosa Martins. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Acta Botanica Brasilica and Acta Amazonica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.