Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of E.E. Saari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.E. Saari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.E. Saari more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.E. Saari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.E. Saari. The network helps show where E.E. Saari may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.E. Saari
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.E. Saari.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.E. Saari based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E.E. Saari. E.E. Saari is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Saari, E.E., et al.. (1998). Experience with wheat rusts in South Asia.. 177–190.
2.
Saari, E.E.. (1998). Leaf blight diseases and associated soilborne fungal pathogens of wheat in South and Southeast Asia.25 indexed citations
3.
Wilcoxson, R. D. & E.E. Saari. (1996). Bunt and smut diseases of wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. CIMMYT eBooks.124 indexed citations
4.
Saari, E.E., et al.. (1994). Guide to the CIMMYT wheat crop protection subprogram.2 indexed citations
Rajaram, S., et al.. (1992). Durum wheats : challenges and opportunities.21 indexed citations
7.
Stubbs, R. W., J.M. Prescott, E.E. Saari, & H. J. Dubin. (1986). Cereal disease methodology manual. CIMMYT eBooks.134 indexed citations
8.
Abdalla, O., et al.. (1986). Spring triticale : names; parentage; pedigrees; origins.2 indexed citations
9.
Prescott, J.M., P. A. Burnett, E.E. Saari, et al.. (1986). Wheat diseases and pests: a guide for field identification.57 indexed citations
10.
Stubbs, R. W., J.M. Prescott, E.E. Saari, & H. J. Dubin. (1986). Manual de metodología sobre las enfermedades de los cereales.7 indexed citations
11.
Saari, E.E.. (1985). Distribution and importance of root rot diseases of wheat, barley and triticale in South and Southeast Asia.. 189–195.10 indexed citations
12.
Nagarajan, S., et al.. (1984). An analysis of the 1978 epidemic of yellow rust on wheat in Andalusia, Spain. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 91(2). 159–170.2 indexed citations
13.
Nagarajan, S., S. K. Sinha, L. M. Joshi, & E.E. Saari. (1980). Interaction between kernel filling in wheat and leaf rust infection in North India.. 87(4). 221–226.1 indexed citations
Joshi, L. M., B. L. Renfro, E.E. Saari, R. D. Wilcoxson, & S. P. Raychaudhuri. (1970). Rust and smut diseases of Wheat in India.. The Plant disease reporter. 54(5). 391–394.8 indexed citations
19.
Joshi, L. M., B. L. Renfro, E.E. Saari, R. D. Wilcoxson, & S. P. Raychaudhuri. (1970). Diseases of wheat in India other than rusts and smuts. The Plant disease reporter. 54(7). 594–597.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.