A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases
Impact in
- Plant Science 294
Classified as
- Authors
- E.E. SaariJ.M. Prescott
- Journal
- The Plant disease reporter
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6712226 →Countries where authors are citing A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases
This map shows the geographic impact of A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases
This network shows the impact of A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases.
About A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases
This paper, published in 1975, received 305 indexed citations . Written by E.E. Saari and J.M. Prescott covering the research area of Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Agronomy and Crop Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (294 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (63 citations), Cell Biology (34 citations), Genetics (25 citations) and Molecular Biology (17 citations). Published in The Plant disease reporter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6712226.