Annual Review of Phytopathology

1.6k papers and 179.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Annual Review of Phytopathology in the last decades have received a total of 179.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Phytopathology usually cover Plant Science (1.4k papers), Cell Biology (561 papers) and Molecular Biology (232 papers) specifically the topics of Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (602 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (561 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (319 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Phytopathology are Jane Glazebrook, H. H. Flor, David M. Weller, Corné M. J. Pieterse, Bruce A. McDonald, L.C. van Loon, Andrew Hayward, Clarence A. Ryan, Xinnian Dong and Wendy E. Durrant.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Phytopathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Phytopathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Phytopathology.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Phytopathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Phytopathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Phytopathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Phytopathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025