Edwin T. Sugita
- Pharmaceutical Science top 2%
- Oncology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- James T. DoluisioPaul J. NiebergallNorman F. BillupsLewis W. DittertJoseph V. SwintoskyRoger L. SchnaareJoseph B. SchwartzDaniel A. Hussar
- Topics
- Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (12 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (10 papers)Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Edwin T. Sugita
40 papers receiving 742 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Pharmaceutical Science 228
- Oncology 197
- Pharmacology 182
- Molecular Biology 164
- Analytical Chemistry 141
Countries citing papers authored by Edwin T. Sugita
This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin T. Sugita's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin T. Sugita with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin T. Sugita more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin T. Sugita
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin T. Sugita. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin T. Sugita. The network helps show where Edwin T. Sugita may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwin T. Sugita
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwin T. Sugita. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwin T. Sugita based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edwin T. Sugita. Edwin T. Sugita is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | Skin potential changes in the guinea pig due to depilation and the repeated application of polyethlyene glycol and retinoic acid | 1 |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Edwin T. Sugita
Edwin T. Sugita is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Analytical Chemistry and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 42 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (12 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (10 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (228 citations), Analytical Chemistry (141 citations) and Pharmacology (182 citations). Edwin T. Sugita has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James T. Doluisio, Paul J. Niebergall, Norman F. Billups, Lewis W. Dittert, Joseph V. Swintosky, Roger L. Schnaare, Joseph B. Schwartz, Daniel A. Hussar, Robert L. Mayock and Zhi‐Ling Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Biochemistry, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.