Edward R. Sauter
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Oncology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wenyi QinWeizhu ZhuMeenhard HerlynAndres J. Klein–SzantoMichael F. HolickZhiren LuTai C. ChenSamuel Litwin
- Topics
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (22 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (20 papers)Estrogen and related hormone effects (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Edward R. Sauter
195 papers receiving 6.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Molecular Biology 3.2k
- Cancer Research 1.8k
- Oncology 1.6k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
- Surgery 696
Countries citing papers authored by Edward R. Sauter
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward R. Sauter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward R. Sauter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward R. Sauter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward R. Sauter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward R. Sauter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward R. Sauter. The network helps show where Edward R. Sauter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward R. Sauter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward R. Sauter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward R. Sauter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward R. Sauter. Edward R. Sauter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 69 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 82 | |
| 8 | 141 | |
| 9 | 118 | |
| 10 | 124 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 111 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | Resveratrol induced DNA methylation in ER+ breast cancer | 6 |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | Prostate-specific antigen levels in nipple aspirate fluid correlate with breast cancer risk. | 102 |
| 19 | Antifungal activity of some model Soft lysosomotropic compounds | 5 |
| 20 | 5 |
About Edward R. Sauter
Edward R. Sauter is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology, having authored 198 papers that have together received 7.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (22 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (20 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.8k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations) and Oncology (1.6k citations). Edward R. Sauter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Wenyi Qin, Weizhu Zhu, Meenhard Herlyn, Andres J. Klein–Szanto, Michael F. Holick, Zhiren Lu, Tai C. Chen, Samuel Litwin, Bing Li and John E. Hewett. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Cell and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.