Edward M. Brecher
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Epidemiology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Donald N. KosterWilliam H. MastersVirginia E. JohnsonJeremy BrecherMaria Pietronilla Penna
- Topics
- Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper)Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (1 paper)Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edward M. Brecher
12 papers receiving 442 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Clinical Psychology 155
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Epidemiology 118
- General Health Professions 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 66
Countries citing papers authored by Edward M. Brecher
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward M. Brecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward M. Brecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward M. Brecher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward M. Brecher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward M. Brecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward M. Brecher. The network helps show where Edward M. Brecher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward M. Brecher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward M. Brecher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward M. Brecher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward M. Brecher. Edward M. Brecher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Consumers Union Report on Licit and Illicit Drugs | 12 |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | Love, Sex, and Aging | 45 |
| 5 | Love, sex, and aging: A Consumers Union report | 29 |
| 6 | Treatment Programs for Sex Offenders. | 24 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | Health care in correctional institutions | 12 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Licit and Illicit Drugsbreakdown → | 332 |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | An analysis of human sexual response | 22 |
| 13 | The sex researchers | 32 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Edward M. Brecher
Edward M. Brecher is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (1 paper) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (26 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations) and Gender Studies (48 citations). Edward M. Brecher has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Donald N. Koster, William H. Masters, Virginia E. Johnson, Jeremy Brecher and Maria Pietronilla Penna. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and The Journal of Sex Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.