Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Virginia E. Johnson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Virginia E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virginia E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia E. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Virginia E. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virginia E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virginia E. Johnson. The network helps show where Virginia E. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Virginia E. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Virginia E. Johnson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Virginia E. Johnson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Virginia E. Johnson. Virginia E. Johnson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Masters, William H. & Virginia E. Johnson. (1998). The sexual response cycle of the human female. III. The clitoris: anatomic and clinical consideration.. PubMed. 70. 248–57.16 indexed citations
3.
Masters, William H. & Virginia E. Johnson. (1998). The sexual response of the human male. I. Gross anatomic considerations.. PubMed. 71. 85–95.8 indexed citations
4.
Masters, William H. & Virginia E. Johnson. (1998). The physiology of the vaginal reproductive function.. PubMed. 69. 105–20.14 indexed citations
5.
Masters, William H., Virginia E. Johnson, & Robert C. Kolodny. (1996). Eros: los mundos de la sexualidad. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).8 indexed citations
6.
Keeling, Richard P., et al.. (1989). Creating a Crisis. The Hastings Center Report. 19(2). 42–42.1 indexed citations
7.
Masters, William H., Virginia E. Johnson, & Robert C. Kolodny. (1988). El sexo en los tiempos del SIDA. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).1 indexed citations
8.
Masters, William H., Virginia E. Johnson, & Robert C. Kolodny. (1987). Liebe und Sexualität. Ullstein eBooks.1 indexed citations
9.
Masters, William H. & Virginia E. Johnson. (1985). pleasure bond: a new look at sexuality.1 indexed citations
Kolodny, Robert C., William H. Masters, & Virginia E. Johnson. (1979). Textbook of sexual medicine. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).127 indexed citations
Johnson, Virginia E., et al.. (1976). Principles of the new sex therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133(5). 548–554.67 indexed citations
18.
Brecher, Edward M., William H. Masters, & Virginia E. Johnson. (1969). The sex researchers. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).32 indexed citations
19.
Masters, William H. & Virginia E. Johnson. (1961). Intravaginal Environment. Fertility and Sterility. 12(6). 560–580.3 indexed citations
20.
Masters, William H. & Virginia E. Johnson. (1960). The human female: anatomy of sexual response.. PubMed. 43. 31–6.22 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.