Edward F. Brown
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Geophysics top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lars BildstenF. X. TimmesChristopher MankovichDennis StelloBill PaxtonΜ. H. MontgomeryAaron DotterPhil Arras
- Topics
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (43 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (40 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (36 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Edward F. Brown
87 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 4.8k
- Geophysics 1.2k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.0k
- Instrumentation 670
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 365
Countries citing papers authored by Edward F. Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward F. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward F. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward F. Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward F. Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward F. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward F. Brown. The network helps show where Edward F. Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward F. Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward F. Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward F. Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward F. Brown. Edward F. Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 55 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | dStar: Neutron star thermal evolution code | 3 |
| 8 | 78 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 64 | |
| 19 | 113 | |
| 20 | An Interactive Graphics Conferencing Test-Bed. | 3 |
About Edward F. Brown
Edward F. Brown is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 91 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (43 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (40 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (4.8k citations), Instrumentation (670 citations) and Geophysics (1.2k citations). Edward F. Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Lars Bildsten, F. X. Timmes, Christopher Mankovich, Dennis Stello, Bill Paxton, Μ. H. Montgomery, Aaron Dotter, Phil Arras, R. H. D. Townsend and Matteo Cantiello. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.