Edward D. Green
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Cancer Research
- Oncology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Linda MoyPriscilla J. SlanetzMary S. NewellAna P. LourençoMonica YepesSu‐Ju LeeAnna I. HolbrookSamantha L. Heller
- Topics
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers)Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American College of RadiologyMolecular Imaging and BiologySouthern Medical Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Edward D. Green
11 papers receiving 425 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 173
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 167
- Cancer Research 146
- Oncology 116
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 95
Countries citing papers authored by Edward D. Green
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward D. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward D. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward D. Green more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward D. Green
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward D. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward D. Green. The network helps show where Edward D. Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward D. Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward D. Green. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward D. Green based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward D. Green. Edward D. Green is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 119 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 60 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 52 | |
| 12 | 56 |
About Edward D. Green
Edward D. Green is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (146 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (167 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (173 citations). Edward D. Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Linda Moy, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Mary S. Newell, Ana P. Lourenço, Monica Yepes, Su‐Ju Lee, Anna I. Holbrook, Samantha L. Heller, Roberta M. diFlorio‐Alexander and Martha B. Mainiero. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Biology and Southern Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.