Lynn L. Simpson

6.5k total citations
123 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Lynn L. Simpson is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lynn L. Simpson has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 47 papers in Surgery and 47 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Lynn L. Simpson's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (30 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (27 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (23 papers). Lynn L. Simpson is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (30 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (27 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (23 papers). Lynn L. Simpson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Lynn L. Simpson's co-authors include Mary E. D’Alton, Brian T. Bateman, Thomas J. Herzog, Jason D. Wright, Young Mi Lee, Sharyn N. Lewin, Sreedhar Gaddipati, Clarissa Bonanno, Xuming Sun and Patricia Devine and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PEDIATRICS and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Lynn L. Simpson

118 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lynn L. Simpson United States 30 1.7k 1.4k 671 631 407 123 2.9k
G. Ohel Israel 29 1.1k 0.6× 1.2k 0.9× 751 1.1× 479 0.8× 440 1.1× 143 3.0k
Lynn Sadler New Zealand 26 741 0.4× 1.1k 0.8× 541 0.8× 557 0.9× 772 1.9× 115 2.6k
Sæmundur Gudmundsson Sweden 33 1.7k 1.0× 1.7k 1.3× 395 0.6× 615 1.0× 500 1.2× 121 3.2k
Daniel H. Saltzman United States 30 1.7k 1.1× 1.6k 1.1× 915 1.4× 496 0.8× 747 1.8× 142 3.0k
Ihab M. Usta Lebanon 27 1.6k 1.0× 1.6k 1.2× 836 1.2× 445 0.7× 300 0.7× 115 3.0k
Marco Liberati Italy 38 2.9k 1.7× 3.2k 2.3× 1.5k 2.2× 536 0.8× 327 0.8× 161 4.9k
Loı̈c Marpeau France 34 1.5k 0.9× 1.7k 1.2× 874 1.3× 784 1.2× 292 0.7× 101 3.2k
Svein Rasmussen Norway 32 2.5k 1.5× 2.5k 1.8× 472 0.7× 572 0.9× 525 1.3× 109 3.6k
Anna Locatelli Italy 27 1.2k 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 744 1.1× 568 0.9× 515 1.3× 149 2.6k
T. Flint Porter United States 36 2.4k 1.5× 2.2k 1.6× 1.4k 2.1× 399 0.6× 382 0.9× 92 5.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Lynn L. Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynn L. Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynn L. Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynn L. Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynn L. Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynn L. Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynn L. Simpson. The network helps show where Lynn L. Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynn L. Simpson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynn L. Simpson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynn L. Simpson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynn L. Simpson. Lynn L. Simpson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Paek, Bettina, Liesbeth Lewi, Femke Slaghekke, et al.. (2025). Consensus update on twin‐twin transfusion syndrome staging: An international Delphi study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(5).
2.
Freud, Lindsay R. & Lynn L. Simpson. (2024). Fetal cardiac screening: 1st trimester and beyond. Prenatal Diagnosis. 44(6-7). 679–687. 2 indexed citations
3.
Shah, Amee, Stéphanie Levasseur, Chia‐Ling Nhan‐Chang, et al.. (2021). The role of fetal echocardiogram after detection of extracardiac anomalies in utero (fetal echocardiogram for extracardiac malformations). Prenatal Diagnosis. 41(9). 1134–1139. 3 indexed citations
4.
Sutton, Desmond, Timothy Wen, Yongmei Huang, et al.. (2021). Clinical and Demographic Risk Factors for COVID-19 during Delivery Hospitalizations in New York City. American Journal of Perinatology. 38(8). 857–868. 8 indexed citations
5.
Deprest, Jan, Mahesh Choolani, Frank A. Chervenak, et al.. (2020). Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidance on Behalf of the International Fetal Medicine and Surgery Society. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 47(9). 689–698. 26 indexed citations
6.
Andrikopoulou, Maria, Nigel Madden, Timothy Wen, et al.. (2020). Symptoms and Critical Illness Among Obstetric Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 136(2). 291–299. 66 indexed citations
7.
Sacco, Adalina, Lynn L. Simpson, Jan Deprest, & Anna L. David. (2018). A study to assess global availability of fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Prenatal Diagnosis. 38(13). 1020–1027. 38 indexed citations
8.
Wall, Darci J., Marcia C. Javitt, Phyllis Glanc, et al.. (2015). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Infertility. Ultrasound Quarterly. 31(1). 37–44. 9 indexed citations
9.
Emery, Stephen P., Mert Ozan Bahtiyar, Jodi S. Dashe, et al.. (2015). The North American Fetal Therapy Network Consensus Statement. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 125(5). 1236–1243. 35 indexed citations
10.
Bhosale, Priyadarshani R., Marcia C. Javitt, Mostafa Atri, et al.. (2015). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group. Ultrasound Quarterly. 32(2). 108–115. 48 indexed citations
11.
Lalwani, Neeraj, Theodore J. Dubinsky, Marcia C. Javitt, et al.. (2014). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer. Ultrasound Quarterly. 30(1). 21–28. 28 indexed citations
12.
Harris, Robert D., Marcia C. Javitt, Phyllis Glanc, et al.. (2013). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass. Ultrasound Quarterly. 29(1). 79–86. 17 indexed citations
13.
Podrasky, Ann E., Marcia C. Javitt, Phyllis Glanc, et al.. (2013). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Second and Third Trimester Bleeding. Ultrasound Quarterly. 29(4). 293–301. 8 indexed citations
14.
Lane, Barton, Jade J. Wong-You–Cheong, Marcia C. Javitt, et al.. (2013). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® First Trimester Bleeding. Ultrasound Quarterly. 29(2). 91–96. 18 indexed citations
15.
Zelop, Carolyn M., Marcia C. Javitt, Phyllis Glanc, et al.. (2013). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Growth Disturbances — Risk of Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Ultrasound Quarterly. 29(3). 147–151. 10 indexed citations
16.
Javitt, Marcia C., Phyllis Glanc, Rochelle F. Andreotti, et al.. (2012). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Multiple Gestations. Ultrasound Quarterly. 28(2). 149–155. 10 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Jason D., Patricia Devine, Monjri Shah, et al.. (2010). Morbidity and Mortality of Peripartum Hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 115(6). 1187–1193. 108 indexed citations
18.
19.
Spadola, Alexandra & Lynn L. Simpson. (2005). Selective Termination Procedures in Monochorionic Pregnancies. Seminars in Perinatology. 29(5). 330–337. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026