Anna I. Holbrook

1.0k total citations
25 papers, 659 citations indexed

About

Anna I. Holbrook is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna I. Holbrook has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 659 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 12 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 10 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Anna I. Holbrook's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (10 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers). Anna I. Holbrook is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (10 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers). Anna I. Holbrook collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Netherlands. Anna I. Holbrook's co-authors include Mary S. Newell, Linda Moy, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Ana P. Lourenço, Samantha L. Heller, Roberta M. diFlorio‐Alexander, Bethany L. Niell, Nina S. Vincoff, Alana A. Lewin and Ashley Stuckey and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Anna I. Holbrook

24 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna I. Holbrook United States 14 246 244 232 206 140 25 659
Nina S. Vincoff United States 11 179 0.7× 162 0.7× 167 0.7× 180 0.9× 109 0.8× 20 499
Monica Yepes United States 14 235 1.0× 193 0.8× 237 1.0× 243 1.2× 121 0.9× 36 616
Edward D. Green United States 9 146 0.6× 173 0.7× 167 0.7× 116 0.6× 95 0.7× 12 435
Jennifer Chun United States 14 286 1.2× 163 0.7× 220 0.9× 311 1.5× 207 1.5× 46 719
Pietro Panizza Italy 11 348 1.4× 432 1.8× 327 1.4× 232 1.1× 116 0.8× 45 865
Elizabeth R. DePeri United States 11 411 1.7× 598 2.5× 510 2.2× 148 0.7× 77 0.6× 13 992
Valerie Fein‐Zachary United States 14 129 0.5× 284 1.2× 124 0.5× 131 0.6× 243 1.7× 29 576
Wende Logan-Young United States 10 134 0.5× 287 1.2× 158 0.7× 131 0.6× 192 1.4× 16 658
Fabian Riedel Germany 15 359 1.5× 126 0.5× 190 0.8× 267 1.3× 92 0.7× 68 696
Dolores Salas Spain 15 232 0.9× 105 0.4× 211 0.9× 475 2.3× 227 1.6× 43 711

Countries citing papers authored by Anna I. Holbrook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna I. Holbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna I. Holbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna I. Holbrook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna I. Holbrook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna I. Holbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna I. Holbrook. The network helps show where Anna I. Holbrook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna I. Holbrook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna I. Holbrook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna I. Holbrook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna I. Holbrook. Anna I. Holbrook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lawal, Ismaheel O., Sarah Friend, Jane Meisel, et al.. (2022). A Tale of 3 Tracers. Clinical Nuclear Medicine. 48(1). e26–e27. 2 indexed citations
2.
Holbrook, Anna I. & Claudia J. Kasales. (2019). Advancing Competency-Based Medical Education Through Assessment and Feedback in Breast Imaging. Academic Radiology. 27(3). 442–446. 6 indexed citations
3.
Holbrook, Anna I., et al.. (2019). The Association of Breast Pain with Malignancy. Journal of Breast Imaging. 1(3). 177–181. 1 indexed citations
4.
Mendoza, Dexter P., et al.. (2018). Using Wellness Days to Mitigate Resident Burnout. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 16(2). 221–223. 14 indexed citations
5.
6.
Lourenço, Ana P., Linda Moy, Paul L. Baron, et al.. (2018). ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Breast Implant Evaluation. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(5). S13–S25. 38 indexed citations
7.
Mendoza, Dexter P., et al.. (2018). Supporting Radiology Residents’ Professional Development Through a Competitive Intramural Grant. Academic Radiology. 26(2). 286–289. 2 indexed citations
8.
diFlorio‐Alexander, Roberta M., Priscilla J. Slanetz, Linda Moy, et al.. (2018). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Imaging of Pregnant and Lactating Women. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(11). S263–S275. 54 indexed citations
9.
Holbrook, Anna I., Linda Moy, Esma A. Akin, et al.. (2018). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Pain. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(11). S276–S282. 24 indexed citations
10.
Sechopoulos, Ioannis, Mary S. Newell, Christopher P. Ho, et al.. (2018). Comparison of two-view digital breast tomosynthesis to three-view digital mammography in a simulated screening setting. Acta Radiologica. 60(9). 1094–1101. 2 indexed citations
11.
Niell, Bethany L., Ana P. Lourenço, Linda Moy, et al.. (2018). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Evaluation of the Symptomatic Male Breast. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(11). S313–S320. 43 indexed citations
12.
Mainiero, Martha B., Linda Moy, Paul L. Baron, et al.. (2017). ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Breast Cancer Screening. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 14(11). S383–S390. 119 indexed citations
13.
Jokich, Peter M., Lisa Bailey, Carl J. D’Orsi, et al.. (2017). ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Breast Pain. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 14(5). S25–S33. 24 indexed citations
14.
Slanetz, Priscilla J., Linda Moy, Paul L. Baron, et al.. (2017). ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 14(11). S462–S475. 60 indexed citations
15.
Moy, Linda, Samantha L. Heller, Lisa Bailey, et al.. (2017). ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Palpable Breast Masses. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 14(5). S203–S224. 52 indexed citations
16.
Holbrook, Anna I., et al.. (2016). Shorter Perceived Outpatient MRI Wait Times Associated With Higher Patient Satisfaction. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 13(5). 505–509. 25 indexed citations
17.
Tade, Funmilayo, Michael A. Cohen, Toncred M. Styblo, et al.. (2016). Anti-3-18F-FACBC (18F-Fluciclovine) PET/CT of Breast Cancer: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 57(9). 1357–1363. 57 indexed citations
18.
Holbrook, Anna I. & Mary S. Newell. (2016). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 59(2). 394–402. 4 indexed citations
19.
Fleming, Margaret, Anna I. Holbrook, & Mary S. Newell. (2016). Update on Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation of Breast Cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology. 208(2). 267–274. 32 indexed citations
20.
Holbrook, Anna I., et al.. (2012). Mammographic Appearance of Calcium Hydroxylapatite (RadiesseTM) Injected into the Breast for Nipple Reconstruction. The Breast Journal. 19(1). 104–113. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nina S. Vincoff Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Monica Yepes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Edward D. Green Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Chun Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pietro Panizza Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth R. DePeri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Valerie Fein‐Zachary Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wende Logan-Young Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fabian Riedel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dolores Salas
Rankless by CCL
2026