Eduardo B. Pinto

944 total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 634 citations indexed

About

Eduardo B. Pinto is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Eduardo B. Pinto has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 634 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Strategy and Management, 11 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 7 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Eduardo B. Pinto's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (19 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (11 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (6 papers). Eduardo B. Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (19 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (11 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (6 papers). Eduardo B. Pinto collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Ireland and Bulgaria. Eduardo B. Pinto's co-authors include Gabriela Fernandes, Didier Stricker, Carlos Toro, Íñigo Barandiarán, David Oyarzun, Jorge Posada, Raffaele De Amicis, Peter Eisert, Jürgen Döllner and Madalena Araújo and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence and International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.

In The Last Decade

Eduardo B. Pinto

21 papers receiving 604 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Visual Computing as a Key Enabling Technology for Industrie 4.0 and Industrial Internet

2015 423 citations Eduardo B. Pinto et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Eduardo B. Pinto Portugal	11	301	178	114	90	84	23	634
Martin Pech Czechia	11	313 1.0×	146 0.8×	75 0.7×	97 1.1×	61 0.7×	21	698
Jaroslav Vrchota Czechia	13	389 1.3×	193 1.1×	104 0.9×	112 1.2×	69 0.8×	44	888
Marko Mladineo Croatia	16	520 1.7×	114 0.6×	104 0.9×	135 1.5×	50 0.6×	52	788
Vítor Alcácer Portugal	3	507 1.7×	126 0.7×	83 0.7×	137 1.5×	27 0.3×	4	742
Jones Luís Schaefer Brazil	15	258 0.9×	254 1.4×	80 0.7×	127 1.4×	44 0.5×	42	704
Dorota Stadnicka Poland	17	352 1.2×	227 1.3×	81 0.7×	257 2.9×	86 1.0×	68	796
Jürgen Gausemeier Germany	13	353 1.2×	150 0.8×	172 1.5×	71 0.8×	54 0.6×	110	792
Yangjian Ji China	16	249 0.8×	277 1.6×	293 2.6×	97 1.1×	70 0.8×	52	969
Davy Monticolo France	12	169 0.6×	82 0.5×	99 0.9×	90 1.0×	55 0.7×	50	551
Josip Stjepandić Italy	15	341 1.1×	78 0.4×	143 1.3×	131 1.5×	35 0.4×	45	716

Countries citing papers authored by Eduardo B. Pinto

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eduardo B. Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eduardo B. Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eduardo B. Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eduardo B. Pinto

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eduardo B. Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eduardo B. Pinto. The network helps show where Eduardo B. Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eduardo B. Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eduardo B. Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eduardo B. Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eduardo B. Pinto. Eduardo B. Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Santos, José M. R. C. A., et al.. (2025). Fostering success of collaborative research, development, and innovation projects through project management offices. Procedia Computer Science. 256. 1407–1415.

2.

Santos, José M. R. C. A., et al.. (2024). Key Project Management Practices in Collaborative R&D&I Projects Across Activity Sectors. Procedia Computer Science. 239. 299–306. 1 indexed citations

3.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2024). Useful Project Management Practices in Collaborative R&D&I Projects. Procedia Computer Science. 239. 1062–1069.

4.

Fernandes, Gabriela, José M. R. C. A. Santos, Pedro Ribeiro, et al.. (2023). Critical Success Factors of University-Industry R&D Collaborations. Procedia Computer Science. 219. 1650–1659. 12 indexed citations

5.

Pinto, Eduardo B. & Gabriela Fernandes. (2021). Collaborative R&D the Key Cooperation Domain for University-Industry Partnerships Sustainability – Position Paper. Procedia Computer Science. 181. 102–109. 16 indexed citations

6.

Silva, Cláudia, Pedro Ribeiro, Eduardo B. Pinto, & Paula Monteiro. (2021). Maturity Model for Collaborative R&D University-Industry Sustainable Partnerships. Procedia Computer Science. 181. 811–817. 14 indexed citations

7.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2021). A Stakeholders’ Perspective on Risk Management for Collaborative University-Industry R&D Programs. Procedia Computer Science. 181. 110–118. 11 indexed citations

8.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2020). Critical factors for benefits realisation in collaborative university-industry R&D programs. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management. 12(1). 1–1. 7 indexed citations

9.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2020). Critical factors for benefits realisation in collaborative university-industry R&D programs. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management. 12(1). 1–1. 4 indexed citations

10.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2020). Value of project management in university–industry R&D collaborations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 13(4). 819–843. 21 indexed citations

11.

Fernandes, Gabriela, Madalena Araújo, Eduardo B. Pinto, & Ricardo J. Machado. (2019). An extension of the improving and embedding project management practice framework. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 12(4). 979–1002. 5 indexed citations

12.

Fernandes, Gabriela, José Barbosa, Eduardo B. Pinto, Madalena Araújo, & Ricardo J. Machado. (2019). Applying a Method for Measuring the Performance of University-Industry R&D Collaborations: Case Study Analysis. Procedia Computer Science. 164. 424–432. 10 indexed citations

13.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2019). Key Initiatives to Successfully Manage Collaborative University-Industry R&D: IC-HMI Case Study. Procedia Computer Science. 164. 414–423. 2 indexed citations

14.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2019). From Program Strategic Planning to Program Initiation: Lessons learned from a collaborative University-Industry R&D case study. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 1–9. 1 indexed citations

15.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2018). A Conceptual Social Media Tool for Supporting Collaborative University-Industry R&D Programs. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 1–9. 2 indexed citations

16.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2018). Project Management Practices for Collaborative University-Industry R&D: A Hybrid Approach. Procedia Computer Science. 138. 805–814. 18 indexed citations

17.

Fernandes, Gabriela, et al.. (2017). A Method for Measuring the Success of Collaborative University-Industry R&D Funded Contracts. Procedia Computer Science. 121. 451–460. 14 indexed citations

18.

Fernandes, Gabriela, Eduardo B. Pinto, Madalena Araújo, A. J. Pontes, & Ricardo J. Machado. (2016). Perceptions of Different Stakeholders on Managing Collaborative University-Industry R&D Funded Contracts. Procedia Computer Science. 100. 878–887. 7 indexed citations

19.

Fernandes, Gabriela, Ricardo J. Machado, Eduardo B. Pinto, Madalena Araújo, & A. J. Pontes. (2016). A Quantitative Study to Assess a Program and Project Management Approach for Collaborative University-Industry R&D Funded Contracts. 1–10. 7 indexed citations

20.

Fernandes, Gabriela, Eduardo B. Pinto, Ricardo J. Machado, Madalena Araújo, & A. J. Pontes. (2015). A Program and Project Management Approach for Collaborative University-industry R&D Funded Contracts. Procedia Computer Science. 64. 1065–1074. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact