Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Visual Computing as a Key Enabling Technology for Industrie 4.0 and Industrial Internet
2015423 citationsDidier Stricker, Peter Eisert et al.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applicationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Eisert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Eisert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Eisert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Eisert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Eisert. The network helps show where Peter Eisert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Eisert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Eisert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Eisert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Eisert. Peter Eisert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eisert, Peter & André Gagalowicz. (2013). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Vision / Computer Graphics Collaboration Techniques and Applications.12 indexed citations
14.
Zilly, Frederik, Peter Eisert, & Peter Kauff. (2009). REAL-TIME ANALYSIS AND CORRECTION OF STEREOSCOPIC HDTV SEQUENCES. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii. 36–8.4 indexed citations
15.
Chang, Chuo-Ling, Peter Eisert, & Bernd Girod. (2002). Using a 3-D Shape Model for Video Coding. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 291–297.2 indexed citations
16.
Eisert, Peter. (2002). Model-based Camera Calibration Using Analysis by Synthesis Techniques. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 307–314.26 indexed citations
17.
Magnor, Marcus, Peter Eisert, & Bernd Girod. (2001). Multi-View Image Coding with Depth Maps and 3-D Geometry for Prediction. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft).4 indexed citations
18.
Steinbach, Eckehard, Peter Eisert, & Bernd Girod. (2001). Model-based 3-D Shape and Motion Estimation Using Sliding Textures. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 375–382.5 indexed citations
19.
Steinbach, Eckehard, Peter Eisert, & Bernd Girod. (1999). 3-D Shape Reconstruction from Light Fields Using Voxel Projection. mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich).3 indexed citations
20.
Eisert, Peter & Bernd Girod. (1996). Illumination Compensated Motion Estimation for Analysis Synthesis Coding. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.