Eduard Hochbichler

472 total citations
24 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Eduard Hochbichler is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Eduard Hochbichler has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 9 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Eduard Hochbichler's work include Forest ecology and management (14 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (9 papers). Eduard Hochbichler is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (14 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (9 papers). Eduard Hochbichler collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Iran and Czechia. Eduard Hochbichler's co-authors include Klaus Hackländer, Philipp Gerhardt, Viktor J. Bruckman, Shuai Yan, Gerhard Glatzel, Valeriu-Norocel Nicolescu, Norbert Sauberer, Thorsten Englisch, Georg Grabherr and Sam M. J. G. Steyaert and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Ecology, Plant and Soil and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Eduard Hochbichler

23 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eduard Hochbichler Austria 11 184 158 111 91 46 24 335
Jean-Pierre Saucier Canada 11 209 1.1× 206 1.3× 90 0.8× 38 0.4× 51 1.1× 14 349
Sanja Perić Croatia 8 283 1.5× 239 1.5× 69 0.6× 86 0.9× 43 0.9× 44 445
Orazio Ciancio Italy 10 192 1.0× 227 1.4× 66 0.6× 154 1.7× 31 0.7× 69 395
Kevin A. Solarik Canada 11 200 1.1× 187 1.2× 89 0.8× 74 0.8× 51 1.1× 19 337
Eric Heitzman United States 12 246 1.3× 195 1.2× 138 1.2× 87 1.0× 38 0.8× 30 359
Antonio Nosenzo Italy 6 82 0.4× 244 1.5× 69 0.6× 74 0.8× 38 0.8× 14 320
Jens Peter Skovsgaard Sweden 5 173 0.9× 156 1.0× 72 0.6× 101 1.1× 26 0.6× 10 321
David H. Peter United States 13 207 1.1× 227 1.4× 153 1.4× 76 0.8× 27 0.6× 29 395
Dejan Firm Slovenia 8 216 1.2× 217 1.4× 74 0.7× 146 1.6× 108 2.3× 10 389
Douglas N. Kastendick United States 11 208 1.1× 259 1.6× 112 1.0× 149 1.6× 27 0.6× 18 393

Countries citing papers authored by Eduard Hochbichler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eduard Hochbichler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eduard Hochbichler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eduard Hochbichler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eduard Hochbichler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eduard Hochbichler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eduard Hochbichler. The network helps show where Eduard Hochbichler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eduard Hochbichler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eduard Hochbichler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eduard Hochbichler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eduard Hochbichler. Eduard Hochbichler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sohrabi, Hormoz, et al.. (2025). Optimal integration of forest inventory data and aerial image-based canopy height models for forest stand management. Forest Ecosystems. 13. 100299–100299. 3 indexed citations
2.
Kobler, Johannes, et al.. (2024). How to Optimize Carbon Sinks and Biodiversity in the Conversion of Norway Spruce to Beech Forests in Austria?. Forests. 15(2). 359–359. 1 indexed citations
3.
Huber, Christian, Eduard Hochbichler, Alfred Teischinger, et al.. (2023). Potential alternatives for Norway spruce wood: a selection based on defect-free wood properties. Annals of Forest Science. 80(1). 6 indexed citations
4.
Milanović, Slobodan, Slobodan Milanović, S. Milanović, et al.. (2023). Country-Level Modeling of Forest Fires in Austria and the Czech Republic: Insights from Open-Source Data. Sustainability. 15(6). 5269–5269. 5 indexed citations
5.
Nicolescu, Valeriu-Norocel, Eduard Hochbichler, Viktor J. Bruckman, et al.. (2017). Silvicultural Guidelines for European Coppice Forests. 16 indexed citations
6.
Gerhardt, Philipp, et al.. (2017). Diversionary feeding can reduce red deer habitat selection pressure on vulnerable forest stands, but is not a panacea for red deer damage. Forest Ecology and Management. 407. 166–173. 24 indexed citations
7.
Bruckman, Viktor J., Toru Terada, Kenji Fukuda, Hirokazu Yamamoto, & Eduard Hochbichler. (2016). Overmature periurban Quercus–Carpinus coppice forests in Austria and Japan: a comparison of carbon stocks, stand characteristics and conversion to high forest. European Journal of Forest Research. 135(5). 857–869. 11 indexed citations
8.
Gerhardt, Philipp, et al.. (2013). Determinants of deer impact in European forests – A systematic literature analysis. Forest Ecology and Management. 310. 173–186. 73 indexed citations
9.
10.
Bruckman, Viktor J., Eduard Hochbichler, Shuai Yan, & Gerhard Glatzel. (2010). Determinants of soil organic carbon pools in oak stands in northeastern Austria. EGUGA. 11388. 1 indexed citations
11.
Seidl, Rupert, et al.. (2009). Testing generalized allometries in allocation modeling within an individual-based simulation framework. Trees. 24(1). 139–150. 17 indexed citations
12.
Nicolescu, Valeriu-Norocel, et al.. (2009). Ecology and silviculture of wild service tree (Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz): A literature review. 60(3). 35–44. 15 indexed citations
13.
Oosterbaan, A., Eduard Hochbichler, Valeriu-Norocel Nicolescu, & Heinrich Spiecker. (2008). Silvicultural principles, goals and measures in growing valuable broadleaved tree species. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2008(59). 1–4. 9 indexed citations
14.
Dullinger, Stefan, Thomas Dirnböck, Eduard Hochbichler, et al.. (2005). Interactions among tree‐line conifers: differential effects of pine on spruce and larch. Journal of Ecology. 93(5). 948–957. 32 indexed citations
15.
Hochbichler, Eduard, et al.. (2000). Recommendations for data collection in forest reserves, with an emphasis on regeneration and stand structure. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 135–181. 10 indexed citations
16.
Hochbichler, Eduard, et al.. (2000). Management of oak forests in Austria.. 37. 51–68.
17.
Hochbichler, Eduard, et al.. (2000). Papierrecycling - Forstwirtschaft - Wald: Darstellung möglicher Zusammenhänge. 1 indexed citations
18.
Parviainen, Jari, et al.. (2000). COST Action E4. Forest Reserves Research Network in Europe: mission, goals, outputs, linkages, recommendations and partners. Final report.. 16 indexed citations
19.
Hochbichler, Eduard. (1993). Methods of oak silviculture in Austria. Annales des Sciences Forestières. 50(6). 583–591. 30 indexed citations
20.
Hochbichler, Eduard, et al.. (1990). A tending regime for young oak stands - green pruning as an economic way of producing high-quality wood.. 107(1). 1–12. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026