Edna B. Foa
- Clinical Psychology top 0.05%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan DavidsonDavid F. TolinMartin E. FranklinMichael J. KozakKathryn M. ConnorMeredith E. ColesCarmen P. McLeanJonathan D. Huppert
- Topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (79 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (38 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (37 papers)
- Journals
- JAMASHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Edna B. Foa
172 papers receiving 13.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Clinical Psychology 11.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.6k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.1k
- Social Psychology 1.7k
- Epidemiology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Edna B. Foa
This map shows the geographic impact of Edna B. Foa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna B. Foa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna B. Foa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edna B. Foa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna B. Foa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna B. Foa. The network helps show where Edna B. Foa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edna B. Foa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edna B. Foa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edna B. Foa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edna B. Foa. Edna B. Foa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | Post-traumatic stress | 2 |
| 7 | 70 | |
| 8 | 168 | |
| 9 | 133 | |
| 10 | PTSD: Treatment Efficacy and Future Directions | 3 |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 106 | |
| 16 | 156 | |
| 17 | 429 | |
| 18 | 242 | |
| 19 | Posttraumatic stress disorder : DSM-IV and beyond | 291 |
| 20 | Handbook of behavioral interventions : a clinical guide | 63 |
About Edna B. Foa
Edna B. Foa is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 174 papers that have together received 14.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (79 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (38 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (37 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (11.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4.6k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (744 citations). Edna B. Foa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Davidson, David F. Tolin, Martin E. Franklin, Michael J. Kozak, Kathryn M. Connor, Meredith E. Coles, Carmen P. McLean, Jonathan D. Huppert, Richard H. Weisler and L. Erik Churchill. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.