Edmond Wright
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 5
- Multisensory perception and integration 1
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 3
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 1
- Co-authors
- Gilles Deleuze (1 shared paper)Hugh Tomlinson (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Wright (1 shared paper)Diana Knight (1 shared paper)Willy Maley (1 shared paper)Matthew H. Kramer (1 shared paper)Joseph Bristow (1 shared paper)Robert C. Holub (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy (3 papers)Poetics Today (2 papers)Sociology (1 paper)Paragraph (1 paper)Behavioral and Brain Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Edmond Wright
21 papers receiving 421 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Philosophy 148
- Cultural Studies 61
- Geography, Planning and Development 39
- History and Philosophy of Science 29
- Literature and Literary Theory 68
Countries citing papers authored by Edmond Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Edmond Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmond Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmond Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edmond Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmond Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmond Wright. The network helps show where Edmond Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Edmond Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nietzsche and Philosophy Hit paper breakdown → | 1984 | 427 |
| 2 | 1978 | 13 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 1 |
About Edmond Wright
Edmond Wright is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper) and Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (148 citations), Cultural Studies (61 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (39 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (29 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (68 citations). Edmond Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gilles Deleuze, Hugh Tomlinson, Elizabeth Wright, Diana Knight, Willy Maley, Matthew H. Kramer, Joseph Bristow, Robert C. Holub, Peter Brooker and Lawrence Venuti. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, Poetics Today, Sociology, Paragraph and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.