E. Thomas Doherty
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
-
- Phonetics and Phonology Research 9
- Media Technology top 5%
- Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies 6
- Signal Processing top 5%
- Speech and Audio Processing 8
- Music and Audio Processing 6
- Physiology top 10%
- Voice and Speech Disorders 13
-
- Speech Recognition and Synthesis 13
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 5
-
- Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics 5
- Co-authors
- Thomas ShippHarry HollienR.J. CollierC BurckhardtThomas MurryJohn F. MichelK. S. PenningtonCharles G. Reed
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (10 papers)Journal of Voice (5 papers)Journal of Phonetics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenJapan
In The Last Decade
E. Thomas Doherty
37 papers receiving 641 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Speech and Hearing 113
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 211
- Media Technology 123
- Signal Processing 134
- Physiology 323
Countries citing papers authored by E. Thomas Doherty
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Thomas Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Thomas Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Thomas Doherty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Thomas Doherty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Thomas Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Thomas Doherty. The network helps show where E. Thomas Doherty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Thomas Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 5 | Speech measures indicating workload demand. | 1994 | 38 |
| 6 | 1994 | 41 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 53 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1976 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1975 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1973 | 79 | |
| 18 | 1968 | 44 | |
| 19 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1968 | 13 |
About E. Thomas Doherty
E. Thomas Doherty is a scholar working on Music, Signal Processing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Media Technology and Physiology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech Recognition and Synthesis (13 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (13 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (9 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (8 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (6 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (5 papers) and Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (113 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (211 citations), Media Technology (123 citations), Signal Processing (134 citations) and Physiology (323 citations). E. Thomas Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Shipp, Harry Hollien, R.J. Collier, C Burckhardt, Thomas Murry, John F. Michel, K. S. Pennington, Charles G. Reed, Mark I. Singer and Daniel G. Deschler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Voice, Journal of Phonetics, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Otolaryngology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.