E. Stan

913 total citations
10 papers, 39 citations indexed

About

E. Stan is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Stan has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 39 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in E. Stan's work include Scientific Research and Discoveries (5 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (4 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). E. Stan is often cited by papers focused on Scientific Research and Discoveries (5 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (4 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). E. Stan collaborates with scholars based in Romania, Bulgaria and Spain. E. Stan's co-authors include C. Beşliu, D. Felea, T. Eşanu, P. I. Zarubin, V. Bradnová, M. M. Chernyavsky, I. G. Zarubina, P. A. Rukoyatkin, M. Haiduc and A. D. Kovalenko and has published in prestigious journals such as Computer Physics Communications, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Physics of Atomic Nuclei.

In The Last Decade

E. Stan

9 papers receiving 37 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E. Stan Romania	4	21	13	11	5	5	10	39
E. Lipeles United States	4	24 1.1×	6 0.5×	15 1.4×	6 1.2×	5 1.0×	8	30
X. Vilasis-Cardona Spain	3	36 1.7×	6 0.5×	7 0.6×	11 2.2×	2 0.4×	4	40
L. Zanello Italy	5	28 1.3×	4 0.3×	12 1.1×	2 0.4×	5 1.0×	11	36
C. Petridou Greece	5	49 2.3×	3 0.2×	9 0.8×	3 0.6×	8 1.6×	16	57
B. Mitrica Romania	5	30 1.4×	7 0.5×	9 0.8×		14 2.8×	12	44
Richard Gray New Zealand	3	34 1.6×	12 0.9×	4 0.4×	2 0.4×	19 3.8×	4	50
E. P. Velicheva Russia	4	9 0.4×	13 1.0×	5 0.5×		16 3.2×	16	27
J. Martens Netherlands	2	13 0.6×	3 0.2×	3 0.3×	4 0.8×	10 2.0×	2	20
Günther Dissertori Switzerland	5	73 3.5×	3 0.2×	8 0.7×	9 1.8×	2 0.4×	11	87
T. R. Saravanan India	2	9 0.4×	10 0.8×	3 0.3×	23 4.6×	12 2.4×	2	41

Countries citing papers authored by E. Stan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Stan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Stan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Stan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Stan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Stan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Stan. The network helps show where E. Stan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Stan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Stan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Stan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Stan. E. Stan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Beşliu, C., et al.. (2015). Support for massless particles in Chaos Many-Body Engine simulations of nuclear collisions at relativistic energies. Computer Physics Communications. 195. 218–220.

2.

Felea, D., C. Beşliu, E. Stan, et al.. (2014). CMBE v05—Implementation of a toy-model for chaos analysis of relativistic nuclear collisions at the present BNL energies. Computer Physics Communications. 185(11). 3059–3061. 1 indexed citations

3.

Felea, D., et al.. (2012). Hyper-Fractal Analysis: A visual tool for estimating the fractal dimension of 4D objects. Computer Physics Communications. 184(4). 1344–1345. 4 indexed citations

4.

Beşliu, C., et al.. (2012). Code C# for chaos analysis of relativistic many-body systems with reactions. Computer Physics Communications. 183(4). 1055–1059. 3 indexed citations

5.

Beşliu, C., et al.. (2012). Chaos Many-Body Engine v03: A new version of code C# for chaos analysis of relativistic many-body systems with reactions. Computer Physics Communications. 184(4). 1346–1347. 2 indexed citations

6.

Felea, D., et al.. (2011). Intermittency route to chaos for the nuclear billiard. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 93(4). 42001–42001. 2 indexed citations

7.

Beşliu, C., et al.. (2011). On the new possibility to describe the time evolution in nuclear collisions at high energies. Indian Journal of Physics. 85(7). 1175–1179. 1 indexed citations

8.

Beşliu, C., et al.. (2010). Code C# for chaos analysis of relativistic many-body systems. Computer Physics Communications. 181(8). 1464–1470. 6 indexed citations

9.

Felea, D., et al.. (2009). A new version of Visual tool for estimating the fractal dimension of images. Computer Physics Communications. 181(4). 831–832. 1 indexed citations

10.

Bradnová, V., P. I. Zarubin, I. G. Zarubina, et al.. (2007). Features of the 9Be → 2He fragmentation in an emulsion for an energy of 1.2 GeV per nucleon. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 70(7). 1222–1225. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact