E. Schark
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences
- Radiation top 10%
- Nuclear Physics and Applications
- Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Atomic and Molecular Physics 4
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Co-authors
- H. Raimbault-Hartmann (3 shared papers)Matthias König (3 shared papers)J. Szerypo (4 shared papers)D. Beck (4 shared papers)S. Schwarz (4 shared papers)H.-J. Kluge (2 shared papers)G. Bollen (3 shared papers)John D. Stein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The European Physical Journal A (1 paper)Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms (1 paper)Nuclear Physics A (1 paper)Physica Scripta (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandPoland
In The Last Decade
E. Schark
5 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 141
- Radiation 63
- Spectroscopy 58
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 100
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 9
Countries citing papers authored by E. Schark
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Schark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Schark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Schark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Schark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Schark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Schark. The network helps show where E. Schark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Schark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 0 |
About E. Schark
E. Schark is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Food Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (2 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (1 paper) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (141 citations), Radiation (63 citations), Spectroscopy (58 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (100 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (9 citations). E. Schark has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Poland. Frequent co-authors include H. Raimbault-Hartmann, Matthias König, J. Szerypo, D. Beck, S. Schwarz, H.-J. Kluge, G. Bollen, John D. Stein, G. Bollen and A. Kohl. Their work appears in journals such as The European Physical Journal A, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Nuclear Physics A and Physica Scripta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.