E. Ritter

460 citations
14 papers · 350 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

E. Ritter

14 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

E. Ritter
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Structural Biology 11
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 228
  • Catalysis 34
  • Atmospheric Science 50
  • Electrochemistry 17
Replace R. Morin with:
R. Morin France
M. G. Youngquist United States
Ke Bian China
Alfred J. Weymouth Germany
Chonghai Qi China
Hans‐Fridtjof Pernau Germany
Y. Ohno Japan
Julian A. Sanelli Australia
B.J. Gellatly United Kingdom
Eun Seong Lee South Korea
E. Ritter relative to R. Morin France R. Morin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
R. Morin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Ritter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Ritter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Ritter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Ritter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Ritter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Ritter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Ritter. The network helps show where E. Ritter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside E. Ritter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Ritter Line = papers co-authored together E. Ritter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1987102
2 198693
3 198646
4 198624
5 199323
6 197918
7 198611
8 19899
9 19898
10
Effects of method of hemostasis on wound-infection rate.
19907
11 19795
12 19892
13 19941
14 19871

About E. Ritter

E. Ritter is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (5 papers), Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (2 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (1 paper) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (11 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (228 citations), Catalysis (34 citations), Atmospheric Science (50 citations) and Electrochemistry (17 citations). E. Ritter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include R. Jürgen Behm, W. Hösler, J. Wintterlin, G. Binnig, Dirk Reinhardt, Peter C. Hüttemeier, H. Schulz, D F Devereux, William J. Barwick and Charles W. Wyble. Their work appears in journals such as Surface Science, Inflammation Research, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, IBM Journal of Research and Development and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact