Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

4.4k papers and 85.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum in the last decades have received a total of 85.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum usually cover Plant Science (3.8k papers), Molecular Biology (1.8k papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (299 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (1.4k papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (714 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (479 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum are Magdalena Krzesłowska, Waldemar Maksymiec, Hanna Bandurska, Dilfuza Egamberdieva, Renata Rucińska-Sobkowiak, Muhammad Ashraf, Grzegorz Bartosz, Sanjib Kumar Panda, Iwona Morkunas and Małgorzata M. Posmyk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Physiologiae Plantarum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025