E. Nickel
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cell Biology
- Physiology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Lincoln T. PotterPeter G. WaserDirk PetteClaus HeilmannDieter BrdiczkaHéctor R. FernándezE. GrieshaberRandolf Menzel
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
E. Nickel
18 papers receiving 423 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Molecular Biology 298
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 270
- Cell Biology 72
- Physiology 52
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 34
Countries citing papers authored by E. Nickel
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Nickel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Nickel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Nickel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Nickel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Nickel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Nickel. The network helps show where E. Nickel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Nickel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Nickel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Nickel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Nickel. E. Nickel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 105 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 98 | |
| 9 | [Electron microscopic studies on degeneration and regeneration of the nervus phrenicus of the white rat]. | 1 |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | [Electron microscopic studies of the diaphragm of the mouse following unilateral phrenicotomy. I. The degenerating motor end plate]. | 46 |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1 |
About E. Nickel
E. Nickel is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Electrochemistry and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (270 citations), Cell Biology (72 citations) and Molecular Biology (298 citations). E. Nickel has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lincoln T. Potter, Peter G. Waser, Dirk Pette, Claus Heilmann, Dieter Brdiczka, Héctor R. Fernández, E. Grieshaber, Randolf Menzel, A. Vogel and Hans‐Willi Honegger. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Brain Research and European Journal of Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.