E. Mumm

851 citations
18 papers · 198 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

E. Mumm

18 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

E. Mumm
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 118
  • Aerospace Engineering 66
  • Mechanical Engineering 70
  • Ocean Engineering 21
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 23
Replace Lori Shiraishi with:
Lori Shiraishi United States
A. Okon United States
Stephen Johnstone United States
H. Schroeven-Deceuninck
David J. Barnhart United Kingdom
H. Stephen Wright United States
Qian Xu China
Daochun Huang China
Kong Q. Ha United States
Oscar S. Alvarez-Salazar United States
E. Mumm relative to Lori Shiraishi United States Lori Shiraishi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lori Shiraishi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Mumm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Mumm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Mumm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Mumm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Mumm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Mumm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Mumm. The network helps show where E. Mumm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Mumm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Mumm Line = papers co-authored together E. Mumm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200732
2 200328
3 200624
4 200420
5 201318
6
Honeybee Robotics Planetary Drill Systems
200816
7 201011
8 201211
9 20149
10 20105
11 20154
12 20174
13
Honeybee Robotics Sample Acquisition, Transfer and Processing Technologies Enabling Sample Return Missions
20084
14
Development of Autonomous Drills for Planetary Exploration
20063
15 20133
16 20103
17 20032
18 20081

About E. Mumm

E. Mumm is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Radiation, Ocean Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 18 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (9 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (6 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (3 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (3 papers), Space exploration and regulation (2 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers), Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (2 papers) and Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (118 citations), Aerospace Engineering (66 citations), Mechanical Engineering (70 citations), Ocean Engineering (21 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (23 citations). E. Mumm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include G. Paulsen, K. Zacny, Kiel Davis, Chris Leger, Paul S. Schenker, Shane Farritor, Paolo Pirjanian, Michael Garrett, Hrand Aghazarian and B. Glass. Their work appears in journals such as Earth Moon and Planets, Journal of Field Robotics, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Autonomous Robots and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026