E. M. Patterson
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Geophysics
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Co-authors
- Kentarô YanoA. G. WalkerDalway J. SwaineAnthony HerdFrederick WalkerKaren E. SearsHans ZassenhausR.L. Laju
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers)Advanced Topics in Algebra (6 papers)Rings, Modules, and Algebras (6 papers)
- Journals
- Geochimica et Cosmochimica ActaCurrent BiologyTransactions of the American Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
E. M. Patterson
36 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Applied Mathematics 204
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 195
- Geometry and Topology 170
- Geophysics 55
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 50
Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Patterson
This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Patterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Patterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Patterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Patterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Patterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Patterson. The network helps show where E. M. Patterson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. M. Patterson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. M. Patterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. M. Patterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. M. Patterson. E. M. Patterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Solving problems in vector algebra | 1 |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About E. M. Patterson
E. M. Patterson is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Algebra and Number Theory and Computational Mathematics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (6 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (170 citations), Applied Mathematics (204 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (195 citations). E. M. Patterson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kentarô Yano, A. G. Walker, Dalway J. Swaine, Anthony Herd, Frederick Walker, Karen E. Sears, Hans Zassenhaus, R.L. Laju, Alexa Sadier and David M. Grossnickle. Their work appears in journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Current Biology and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.