This map shows the geographic impact of E. Hadavi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Hadavi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Hadavi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Hadavi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Hadavi. The network helps show where E. Hadavi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Hadavi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Hadavi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Hadavi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Hadavi. E. Hadavi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Badi, H Naghdi, et al.. (2015). Shoot Growth, Gamma-Terpinene and Essential Oil Content of Satureja hortensis L. in Response to Foliar Application of FeSO4 and Citric Acid. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
4.
Solgi, Mousa, et al.. (2015). The evaluation effects of some vegetative propagation methods and plant growth regulators on bulblet production rate in crown imperial (Fritillaria imperialis L.).. Journal of horticulture, forestry and biotechnology. 19(1). 1–6.2 indexed citations
Mirshekari, Bahram, et al.. (2014). EFFECT OF SEEDS PRIMING WITH MICRONUTRIENTS ON GROWTH, SEED YIELD AND MUCILAGE OF PLANTAIN. International Journal of Plant Animal and Environmental Sciences. 2014(3).6 indexed citations
Hadavi, E., et al.. (2013). Effect of different levels of citric acid and salicylic acid at pre-harvesting stage on vase-life of rose (Rosa hybrida L.) cut flower. 4(4). 99–109.5 indexed citations
11.
Hadavi, E., et al.. (2012). Effects of salicylic acid and malic acid on vase life and bacterial and yeast populations of preservative solution in cut gerbera flowers.. International journal of agriscience.. 2(8). 671–674.11 indexed citations
12.
Hadavi, E., et al.. (2012). Effect of different levels of malic acid and salicylic acid in preservative solution on the quality and vase life of cut rose flowers cultivars (Utopia).. International journal of agriscience.. 2(5). 403–407.3 indexed citations
Mehrafarin, A, et al.. (2011). Phytochemical and Agronomical Response of Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) to Bio-fertilizers and Urea Fertilizer Application. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
15.
Khalighi, A, et al.. (2011). Effect of different IBA concentrations and types of cuttings on rooting and flowering Poinsettia pulcherrima L.. International journal of agriscience.. 1(5). 303–310.8 indexed citations
16.
Hadavi, E., et al.. (2011). Application of Microorganisms Compared with Nanoparticles of Silver, Humic Acid and Gibberellic Acid on Vase Life of Cut Gerbera Goodtimming -. 1(1). 27–33.10 indexed citations
17.
Zamani, Sahar, E. Hadavi, & Mohsen Kazemi. (2011). Effect of Some Chemical Treatments on Keeping Quality and Vase Life of Chrysanthemum Cut Flowers. World Applied Sciences Journal. 12(11). 1962–1966.16 indexed citations
Kazemi, Mohsen, et al.. (2010). The effect of Malic acid on the bacteria populations of cut flowers of carnations vase solution.. World Applied Sciences Journal. 10(7). 737–740.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.