E. Douglas Rees

30 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

E. Douglas Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 126
  • Reproductive Medicine 116
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 208
  • Transplantation 18
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 87
Replace J.-P. Persijn with:
J.-P. Persijn Netherlands
Yasushi Nagai Japan
W.H.M. Peters Netherlands
Antonio J. Ruiz‐Alcaraz Spain
Katsuhiko Kuwa Japan
R. Hobkirk Canada
Shiyu Zhang China
A. Kyriakopoulos Germany
Miriam Kidron Israel
Ryo Iwamoto Japan
E. Douglas Rees relative to J.-P. Persijn Netherlands J.-P. Persijn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
J.-P. Persijn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Douglas Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Douglas Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Douglas Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Douglas Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Douglas Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Douglas Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Douglas Rees. The network helps show where E. Douglas Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Douglas Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Douglas Rees Line = papers co-authored together E. Douglas Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981270
2
Estradiol and progesterone binding in uterine leiomyomata and in normal uterine tissues.
1980147
3 195676
4 198139
5 197638
6 196537
7 197131
8 197530
9 197027
10 197524
11 196424
12 196623
13 199721
14 195515
15 197314
16 197512
17 195911
18
Karyotypes of rats from strains of different susceptibility to mammary cancer induction.
19688
19 19767
20 19605

About E. Douglas Rees

E. Douglas Rees is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cancer Research, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (2 papers) and Protein purification and stability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (126 citations), Reproductive Medicine (116 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (208 citations), Transplantation (18 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (87 citations). E. Douglas Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sherwin J. Singer, Eric Wilson, Ruby Miller, R M Kay, Wen‐Jone Chen, James W. Anderson, S. K. Majumdar, R. G. Luke, Paul Mandelstam and Robert H. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Nature, The Lancet, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Clinica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact