E. Charles Leek
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Irene ReppaStephen J. JohnstonFilipe CristinoMartin ArguinGuillaume ThierrySteven P. TipperWilliam C. SchmidtMarie‐Josèphe Tainturier
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (35 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (27 papers)Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (16 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
E. Charles Leek
55 papers receiving 686 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cognitive Neuroscience 547
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 142
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 103
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 83
- Social Psychology 70
Countries citing papers authored by E. Charles Leek
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Charles Leek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Charles Leek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Charles Leek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Charles Leek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Charles Leek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Charles Leek. The network helps show where E. Charles Leek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Charles Leek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Charles Leek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Charles Leek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Charles Leek. E. Charles Leek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About E. Charles Leek
E. Charles Leek is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (35 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (27 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (547 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (103 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (142 citations). E. Charles Leek has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Irene Reppa, Stephen J. Johnston, Filipe Cristino, Martin Arguin, Guillaume Thierry, Steven P. Tipper, William C. Schmidt, Marie‐Josèphe Tainturier, Mark V. Roberts and Alan J. Pegna. Their work appears in journals such as Nature reviews. Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Psychological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.