E. C. Aschenauer

9.6k total citations
32 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

E. C. Aschenauer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, E. C. Aschenauer has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 3 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in E. C. Aschenauer's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (19 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (19 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (18 papers). E. C. Aschenauer is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (19 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (19 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (18 papers). E. C. Aschenauer collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Switzerland. E. C. Aschenauer's co-authors include S. Fazio, T. Ullrich, Raju Venugopalan, Liang Zheng, Björn Schenke, Heikki Mäntysaari, B. S. Page, Pía Zurita, B. S. Page and J. H. Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Reports on Progress in Physics.

In The Last Decade

E. C. Aschenauer

30 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. C. Aschenauer United States 13 418 79 29 16 10 32 445
P. Salabura Poland 9 229 0.5× 70 0.9× 82 2.8× 15 0.9× 11 1.1× 44 278
Dmitry Borisyuk Ukraine 11 335 0.8× 189 2.4× 38 1.3× 16 1.0× 8 0.8× 19 374
Y. Nakatsugawa Japan 7 262 0.6× 194 2.5× 22 0.8× 24 1.5× 8 0.8× 19 308
A. Khoukaz Germany 10 271 0.6× 72 0.9× 23 0.8× 12 0.8× 5 0.5× 34 300
S. B. Nurushev Russia 8 175 0.4× 39 0.5× 32 1.1× 25 1.6× 10 1.0× 31 224
W. J. Llope United States 10 321 0.8× 68 0.9× 105 3.6× 40 2.5× 9 0.9× 16 338
H. En’yo Japan 9 152 0.4× 53 0.7× 50 1.7× 11 0.7× 11 1.1× 26 184
Y. Tajima Japan 9 193 0.5× 65 0.8× 69 2.4× 11 0.7× 12 1.2× 23 235
R. Ent United States 9 263 0.6× 91 1.2× 31 1.1× 10 0.6× 4 0.4× 17 284
E. Pasyuk United States 10 232 0.6× 79 1.0× 43 1.5× 8 0.5× 5 0.5× 24 257

Countries citing papers authored by E. C. Aschenauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. C. Aschenauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. C. Aschenauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. C. Aschenauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. C. Aschenauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. C. Aschenauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. C. Aschenauer. The network helps show where E. C. Aschenauer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. C. Aschenauer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. C. Aschenauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. C. Aschenauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. C. Aschenauer. E. C. Aschenauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Aschenauer, E. C., A. Jentsch, B. S. Page, et al.. (2025). Tagging efficiency study of incoherent diffractive vector meson production at the second interaction region at the Electron-Ion Collider. Physical review. D. 111(7). 2 indexed citations
2.
Aschenauer, E. C., M. D. Baker, A. Jentsch, et al.. (2022). Benchmark eA generator for leptoproduction in high-energy lepton-nucleus collisions. Physical review. D. 106(1). 11 indexed citations
3.
Aschenauer, E. C., Kyle Lee, B. S. Page, & Felix Ringer. (2020). Jet angularities in photoproduction at the Electron-Ion Collider. Physical review. D. 101(5). 23 indexed citations
4.
Tu, Zhoudunming, A. Jentsch, M. D. Baker, et al.. (2020). Probing short-range correlations in the deuteron via incoherent diffractive J/ψ production with spectator tagging at the EIC. Physics Letters B. 811. 135877–135877. 13 indexed citations
5.
Poblaguev, A., E. C. Aschenauer, O. Eyser, et al.. (2018). The HJET polarimeter in RHIC Run 2017. 22–22. 5 indexed citations
6.
Aschenauer, E. C., S. Fazio, Heikki Mäntysaari, et al.. (2018). The electron–ion collider: assessing the energy dependence of key measurements. Reports on Progress in Physics. 82(2). 24301–24301. 112 indexed citations
7.
Zheng, Liang, E. C. Aschenauer, J. H. Lee, Bo-Wen Xiao, & Zhongbao Yin. (2018). Accessing the gluon Sivers function at a future electron-ion collider. Physical review. D. 98(3). 21 indexed citations
8.
Aschenauer, E. C., U. D’Alesio, & F. Murgia. (2016). TMDs and SSAs in hadronic interactions. The European Physical Journal A. 52(6). 20 indexed citations
9.
Matevosyan, Hrayr H., et al.. (2015). Predictions for Sivers single spin asymmetries in one- and two-hadron electroproduction at CLAS12 and EIC. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 92(5). 13 indexed citations
10.
Zheng, Liang, E. C. Aschenauer, & J. H. Lee. (2014). Determination of electron-nucleus collision geometry with forward neutrons. The European Physical Journal A. 50(12). 12 indexed citations
11.
Aschenauer, E. C., A. Bazilevsky, M. Große Perdekamp, et al.. (2012). The RHIC SPIN Program. 2 indexed citations
12.
Moosburger, M., E. C. Aschenauer, W. Eyrich, et al.. (1998). Excitation and decay of the Gamow-Teller giant resonance in90Nb. Physical Review C. 57(2). 602–611. 2 indexed citations
13.
Aschenauer, E. C., Hessel L. Castricum, E. Cisbani, et al.. (1998). High resolution16O(γ*,πp)experiment. Physical Review C. 58(6). 3462–3468. 2 indexed citations
14.
Sigg, D., A. Badertscher, M. Bogdan, et al.. (1996). The strong interaction shift and width of the ground state of pionic hydrogen. Nuclear Physics A. 609(3). 269–309. 40 indexed citations
15.
Aschenauer, E. C., I. Bobeldijk, D. G. Ireland, et al.. (1996). The mass-dependence of meson-exchange currents in the reaction (γ,p). Physics Letters B. 389(3). 470–474. 8 indexed citations
16.
Chatellard, D., J.‐P. Egger, E. Jeannet, et al.. (1995). Determination of theS-Wave Scattering Length in Pionic Deuterium with a High Resolution Crystal Spectrometer. Physical Review Letters. 75(20). 3779–3779. 2 indexed citations
17.
Aschenauer, E. C., W. Eyrich, A. Lehmann, et al.. (1995). Excitation of giant monopole resonance inMg24usingLi6scattering. Physical Review C. 52(6). 3195–3200. 7 indexed citations
18.
Badertscher, A., M. Bogdan, P.F.A. Goudsmit, et al.. (1993). A high resolution reflecting crystal spectrometer to measure 3 keV pionic hydrogen and deuterium X-rays. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 335(3). 470–478. 12 indexed citations
19.
Moosburger, M., E. C. Aschenauer, W. Eyrich, et al.. (1990). (6Li,6He) reaction and Gamow-Teller β decay. Physical Review C. 41(6). 2925–2928. 12 indexed citations
20.
Wirth, H.-F., E. C. Aschenauer, W. Eyrich, et al.. (1990). Investigation of spin-isospin strength in4848Sc and9090Nb using the(6Li,6He) reaction. Physical Review C. 41(6). 2698–2701. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026