Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei
19941.4k citationsRaju Venugopalan et al.profile →
Gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei at small transverse momentum
19941.1k citationsRaju Venugopalan et al.profile →
Green’s function in the color field of a large nucleus
Countries citing papers authored by Raju Venugopalan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Raju Venugopalan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raju Venugopalan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raju Venugopalan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raju Venugopalan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raju Venugopalan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raju Venugopalan. The network helps show where Raju Venugopalan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raju Venugopalan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raju Venugopalan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raju Venugopalan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Raju Venugopalan. Raju Venugopalan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gelis, François, T. Lappi, & Raju Venugopalan. (2008). High energy factorization and long range rapidity correlations in the Glasma. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
13.
Venugopalan, Raju, et al.. (2008). Livelihood Analysis using Wealth Ranking Tool of PRA. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education. 8(3). 75–77.5 indexed citations
14.
Gelis, François & Raju Venugopalan. (2006). Three Lectures on Multi-Particle Production in the Glasma. 37(12). 3253–3314.2 indexed citations
15.
Krasnitz, A., Yasushi Nara, & Raju Venugopalan. (2002). Elliptic Flow from Color Glass Condensate.1 indexed citations
16.
Krasnitz, A. & Raju Venugopalan. (2001). Small x physics and the initial conditions in heavy ion collisions.2 indexed citations
17.
Krasnitz, A. & Raju Venugopalan. (1998). Real time simulations of high-energy nuclear collisions. CERN Bulletin. 71–85.3 indexed citations
18.
Venugopalan, Raju & Prajneshu. (1998). On nonlinear procedure for obtaining length - weight relationship. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 68(1). 70–72.7 indexed citations
19.
Venugopalan, Raju & Prajneshu. (1997). von Bertalanffy growth model with autocorrelated errors. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 44(1). 63–67.3 indexed citations
20.
Venugopalan, Raju & Prajneshu. (1996). Trend analysis in all-India marine products export using statistical modelling techniques. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 43(2). 107–113.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.