Felix Ringer

3.3k total citations
51 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Felix Ringer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Felix Ringer has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Felix Ringer's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (45 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (43 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (34 papers). Felix Ringer is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (45 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (43 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (34 papers). Felix Ringer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Felix Ringer's co-authors include Zhong-Bo Kang, Ivan Vitev, Werner Vogelsang, Xiaohui Liu, Kyle Lee, Feng Yuan, James Declan Mulligan, Wouter J. Waalewijn, Mateusz Andrzej Ploskon and M. Stratmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Computer Physics Communications.

In The Last Decade

Felix Ringer

51 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Felix Ringer United States 21 978 94 86 36 20 51 1.1k
Frank Winter United States 17 803 0.8× 109 1.2× 26 0.3× 32 0.9× 22 1.1× 39 927
Massimiliano Procura Germany 23 1.8k 1.8× 70 0.7× 46 0.5× 152 4.2× 7 0.3× 48 1.8k
Robert Szafron United States 15 855 0.9× 148 1.6× 37 0.4× 80 2.2× 22 1.1× 51 979
Zhong-Bo Kang United States 34 2.8k 2.9× 50 0.5× 40 0.5× 75 2.1× 51 2.5× 121 2.9k
Yi-Bo Yang China 29 2.0k 2.0× 88 0.9× 15 0.2× 65 1.8× 44 2.2× 102 2.2k
M. Stratmann Germany 27 3.2k 3.2× 74 0.8× 24 0.3× 54 1.5× 43 2.1× 75 3.2k
Wouter J. Waalewijn United States 27 2.1k 2.2× 16 0.2× 60 0.7× 105 2.9× 25 1.3× 64 2.2k
Antonin Portelli United Kingdom 18 1.3k 1.3× 102 1.1× 55 0.6× 75 2.1× 10 0.5× 64 1.4k
Alexei Prokudin United States 25 1.7k 1.7× 47 0.5× 14 0.2× 33 0.9× 51 2.5× 70 1.7k
G. Valencia United States 27 2.5k 2.6× 83 0.9× 69 0.8× 246 6.8× 44 2.2× 132 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Ringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Ringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Ringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Ringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Ringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Ringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Ringer. The network helps show where Felix Ringer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felix Ringer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felix Ringer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felix Ringer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felix Ringer. Felix Ringer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mehtar-Tani, Yacine, et al.. (2025). Factorization for jet production in heavy-ion collisions. Physics Letters B. 869. 139827–139827. 2 indexed citations
2.
Araz, Jack Y., et al.. (2025). Point cloud-based diffusion models for the Electron-Ion Collider. Physics Letters B. 868. 139694–139694. 2 indexed citations
3.
Larkoski, Andrew J., et al.. (2024). Is infrared-collinear safe information all you need for jet classification?. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2024(7). 3 indexed citations
4.
Qiu, Jian-Wei, et al.. (2024). Diffusion model approach to simulating electron-proton scattering events. Physical review. D. 110(1). 6 indexed citations
5.
Ringer, Felix, et al.. (2024). Quantum computations of the 𝑶(3) model using qumodes. ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University). 230–230. 2 indexed citations
6.
Arratia, M., Zhong-Bo Kang, Sebouh J. Paul, et al.. (2023). Neutrino-tagged jets at the Electron-Ion Collider. Physical review. D. 107(9). 8 indexed citations
7.
Melnitchouk, Wally, et al.. (2023). Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling with diffusion models. Computer Physics Communications. 296. 109059–109059. 10 indexed citations
8.
Lee, Kyle, James Declan Mulligan, Mateusz Andrzej Ploskon, Felix Ringer, & Feng Yuan. (2023). Machine learning-based jet and event classification at the Electron-Ion Collider with applications to hadron structure and spin physics. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(3). 17 indexed citations
9.
Lai, Y. S., James Declan Mulligan, Mateusz Andrzej Ploskon, & Felix Ringer. (2022). The information content of jet quenching and machine learning assisted observable design. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2022(10). 14 indexed citations
10.
Ringer, Felix, Bo-Wen Xiao, & Feng Yuan. (2020). Can we observe jet P-broadening in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC?. Physics Letters B. 808. 135634–135634. 23 indexed citations
11.
Arratia, M., Y. Song, Felix Ringer, & B. Jacak. (2020). Jets as precision probes in electron-nucleus collisions at the future Electron-Ion Collider. Physical review. C. 101(6). 28 indexed citations
12.
Aschenauer, E. C., Kyle Lee, B. S. Page, & Felix Ringer. (2020). Jet angularities in photoproduction at the Electron-Ion Collider. Physical review. D. 101(5). 23 indexed citations
13.
Qiu, Jian-Wei, Felix Ringer, N. Sato, & Pía Zurita. (2019). Factorization of Jet Cross Sections in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Physical Review Letters. 122(25). 252301–252301. 16 indexed citations
14.
Liu, Xiaohui, Felix Ringer, Werner Vogelsang, & Feng Yuan. (2019). Lepton-Jet Correlations in Deep Inelastic Scattering at the Electron-Ion Collider. Physical Review Letters. 122(19). 192003–192003. 57 indexed citations
15.
Kang, Zhong-Bo, Kyle Lee, Xiaohui Liu, & Felix Ringer. (2019). Soft drop groomed jet angularities at the LHC. Physics Letters B. 793. 41–47. 32 indexed citations
16.
Eren, Engin, et al.. (2018). Threshold and jet radius joint resummation for single-inclusive jet production. Proceedings Of Science. 2–2. 1 indexed citations
17.
Kang, Zhong-Bo, Jian-Wei Qiu, Felix Ringer, Hongxi Xing, & Hong Zhang. (2017). J/ψ Production and Polarization within a Jet. Physical Review Letters. 119(3). 32001–32001. 18 indexed citations
18.
Liu, Xiaohui, et al.. (2017). Threshold and Jet Radius Joint Resummation for Single-Inclusive Jet Production. Physical Review Letters. 119(21). 212001–212001. 29 indexed citations
19.
Kang, Zhong-Bo, Felix Ringer, & Ivan Vitev. (2016). The semi-inclusive jet function in SCET and small radius resummation for inclusive jet production. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2016(10). 95 indexed citations
20.
Ringer, Felix & Werner Vogelsang. (2015). Single-spin asymmetries inWboson production at next-to-leading order. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(9). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026